fix podman pod inspect to support multiple pods

Just like the other inspect commands `podman pod inspect p1 p2` should
return the json for both.

To correctly implement this we follow the container inspect logic, this
allows use to reuse the global inspect command.
Note: To not break the existing single pod output format for podman pod
inspect I added a pod-legacy inspect type. This is only used to make
sure we will print the pod as single json and not an array like for the
other commands. We cannot use the pod type since podman inspect --type
pod did return an array and we should not break that as well.

Fixes #15674

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 43 deletions

diff --git a/cmd/podman/pods/inspect.go b/cmd/podman/pods/inspect.go
index 082e8d9a1..22e781cdf 100644
--- a/cmd/podman/pods/inspect.go
+++ b/cmd/podman/pods/inspect.go
@@ -1,13 +1,8 @@
 package pods
 
 import (
-	"context"
-	"errors"
-	"os"
-	"text/template"
-
-	"github.com/containers/common/pkg/report"
 	"github.com/containers/podman/v4/cmd/podman/common"
+	"github.com/containers/podman/v4/cmd/podman/inspect"
 	"github.com/containers/podman/v4/cmd/podman/registry"
 	"github.com/containers/podman/v4/cmd/podman/validate"
 	"github.com/containers/podman/v4/pkg/domain/entities"
@@ -15,10 +10,6 @@ import (
 )
 
 var (
-	inspectOptions = entities.PodInspectOptions{}
-)
-
-var (
 	inspectDescription = `Display the configuration for a pod by name or id
 
 	By default, this will render all results in a JSON array.`
@@ -27,10 +18,12 @@ var (
 		Use:               "inspect [options] POD [POD...]",
 		Short:             "Displays a pod configuration",
 		Long:              inspectDescription,
-		RunE:              inspect,
+		RunE:              inspectExec,
 		ValidArgsFunction: common.AutocompletePods,
 		Example:           `podman pod inspect podID`,
 	}
+
+	inspectOpts = &entities.InspectOptions{}
 )
 
 func init() {
@@ -41,40 +34,15 @@ func init() {
 	flags := inspectCmd.Flags()
 
 	formatFlagName := "format"
-	flags.StringVarP(&inspectOptions.Format, formatFlagName, "f", "json", "Format the output to a Go template or json")
+	flags.StringVarP(&inspectOpts.Format, formatFlagName, "f", "json", "Format the output to a Go template or json")
 	_ = inspectCmd.RegisterFlagCompletionFunc(formatFlagName, common.AutocompleteFormat(&entities.PodInspectReport{}))
 
-	validate.AddLatestFlag(inspectCmd, &inspectOptions.Latest)
+	validate.AddLatestFlag(inspectCmd, &inspectOpts.Latest)
 }
 
-func inspect(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error {
-	if len(args) < 1 && !inspectOptions.Latest {
-		return errors.New("you must provide the name or id of a running pod")
-	}
-	if len(args) > 0 && inspectOptions.Latest {
-		return errors.New("--latest and containers cannot be used together")
-	}
-
-	if !inspectOptions.Latest {
-		inspectOptions.NameOrID = args[0]
-	}
-	responses, err := registry.ContainerEngine().PodInspect(context.Background(), inspectOptions)
-	if err != nil {
-		return err
-	}
-
-	if report.IsJSON(inspectOptions.Format) {
-		enc := json.NewEncoder(os.Stdout)
-		enc.SetIndent("", "     ")
-		return enc.Encode(responses)
-	}
-
-	// Cannot use report.New() as it enforces {{range .}} for OriginUser templates
-	tmpl := template.New(cmd.Name()).Funcs(template.FuncMap(report.DefaultFuncs))
-	format := report.NormalizeFormat(inspectOptions.Format)
-	tmpl, err = tmpl.Parse(format)
-	if err != nil {
-		return err
-	}
-	return tmpl.Execute(os.Stdout, *responses)
+func inspectExec(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error {
+	// We need backwards compat with the old podman pod inspect behavior.
+	// https://github.com/containers/podman/pull/15675
+	inspectOpts.Type = common.PodLegacyType
+	return inspect.Inspect(args, *inspectOpts)
 }