diff options
author | Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com> | 2020-06-17 05:51:04 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com> | 2020-06-17 07:04:00 -0600 |
commit | 6d5a432c2e6e538308961b9c130c3aeb32138c7b (patch) | |
tree | 648d952668632e4da63dbc7af0e0b2a1be0773f7 /nix | |
parent | 4fb0f56063de13af53128be9da81027d988516be (diff) | |
download | podman-6d5a432c2e6e538308961b9c130c3aeb32138c7b.tar.gz podman-6d5a432c2e6e538308961b9c130c3aeb32138c7b.tar.bz2 podman-6d5a432c2e6e538308961b9c130c3aeb32138c7b.zip |
"streaming output" logs test: fix flake
Test has been flaking excessively. A quick look shows that
the test itself is broken, making a bad assumption.
'podman logs -f' is guaranteed to exit when a container
terminates. This does not (and should not) mean that the
container has been cleaned up. It is undefined and unsafe
to run 'podman run -n same-name-as-terminated-container'
immediately after 'podman logs' exits.
Solution: instead of 'podman run', do 'podman inspect'.
This, too, is unsafe, but we can expect to see one of
two possible conditions:
1) command succeeds, in which case we require that
container State.Status be "exited"; or
2) command fails, in which case we expect "no such
container" in error output
For full coverage we should add a small delay-check test
to (1) to ensure that the container is cleaned up after
a short amount of time. Leaving that as a TODO because
it's more than my Go skills can handle, and I want to
get this checked in ASAP to get rid of the flake hassle.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'nix')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions