summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pkg/bindings/images
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorValentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>2020-03-30 12:13:50 +0200
committerValentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>2020-03-31 13:01:27 +0200
commit3bdad6fa2af41be7e783256f3c8a213dc42ca8f6 (patch)
treeb1d3b9f1b3ee9addd187dc11cfe3585ebd6b02dd /pkg/bindings/images
parent598bb53d46dfc85b8bcc1e3000736106f80de93e (diff)
downloadpodman-3bdad6fa2af41be7e783256f3c8a213dc42ca8f6.tar.gz
podman-3bdad6fa2af41be7e783256f3c8a213dc42ca8f6.tar.bz2
podman-3bdad6fa2af41be7e783256f3c8a213dc42ca8f6.zip
podmanV2: implement pull
Implement pulling images for the v2 client. What I _really_ don't like is the fact that we are now having a near identical code clone among `pkg/domain/infra/abi` and `pkg/api/handlers/libpod`. Partly because we don't yet have a higher-level pull function and partly because we have redudancy among `pkg/domain` and `pkg/api`. Pull might be a high outlier but I am concerned already by the potential of introducing more redundancy. I'd love to `infra/abi` and `pkg/abi` to really use the same code in the future. Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'pkg/bindings/images')
-rw-r--r--pkg/bindings/images/images.go39
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pkg/bindings/images/images.go b/pkg/bindings/images/images.go
index 5e3af7a60..5f5c4443f 100644
--- a/pkg/bindings/images/images.go
+++ b/pkg/bindings/images/images.go
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ import (
"net/url"
"strconv"
+ "github.com/containers/image/v5/types"
"github.com/containers/libpod/pkg/api/handlers"
"github.com/containers/libpod/pkg/bindings"
"github.com/containers/libpod/pkg/domain/entities"
@@ -229,3 +230,41 @@ func Import(ctx context.Context, changes []string, message, reference, u *string
}
return id.ID, response.Process(&id)
}
+
+// Pull is the binding for libpod's v2 endpoints for pulling images. Note that
+// `rawImage` must be a reference to a registry (i.e., of docker transport or be
+// normalized to one). Other transports are rejected as they do not make sense
+// in a remote context.
+func Pull(ctx context.Context, rawImage string, options entities.ImagePullOptions) ([]string, error) {
+ conn, err := bindings.GetClient(ctx)
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, err
+ }
+ params := url.Values{}
+ params.Set("reference", rawImage)
+ params.Set("credentials", options.Credentials)
+ params.Set("overrideArch", options.OverrideArch)
+ params.Set("overrideOS", options.OverrideOS)
+ if options.TLSVerify != types.OptionalBoolUndefined {
+ val := bool(options.TLSVerify == types.OptionalBoolTrue)
+ params.Set("tlsVerify", strconv.FormatBool(val))
+ }
+ params.Set("allTags", strconv.FormatBool(options.AllTags))
+
+ response, err := conn.DoRequest(nil, http.MethodPost, "/images/pull", params)
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, err
+ }
+
+ reports := []handlers.LibpodImagesPullReport{}
+ if err := response.Process(&reports); err != nil {
+ return nil, err
+ }
+
+ pulledImages := []string{}
+ for _, r := range reports {
+ pulledImages = append(pulledImages, r.ID)
+ }
+
+ return pulledImages, nil
+}