diff options
author | Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com> | 2020-06-17 05:51:04 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com> | 2020-06-17 07:04:00 -0600 |
commit | 6d5a432c2e6e538308961b9c130c3aeb32138c7b (patch) | |
tree | 648d952668632e4da63dbc7af0e0b2a1be0773f7 /test/e2e | |
parent | 4fb0f56063de13af53128be9da81027d988516be (diff) | |
download | podman-6d5a432c2e6e538308961b9c130c3aeb32138c7b.tar.gz podman-6d5a432c2e6e538308961b9c130c3aeb32138c7b.tar.bz2 podman-6d5a432c2e6e538308961b9c130c3aeb32138c7b.zip |
"streaming output" logs test: fix flake
Test has been flaking excessively. A quick look shows that
the test itself is broken, making a bad assumption.
'podman logs -f' is guaranteed to exit when a container
terminates. This does not (and should not) mean that the
container has been cleaned up. It is undefined and unsafe
to run 'podman run -n same-name-as-terminated-container'
immediately after 'podman logs' exits.
Solution: instead of 'podman run', do 'podman inspect'.
This, too, is unsafe, but we can expect to see one of
two possible conditions:
1) command succeeds, in which case we require that
container State.Status be "exited"; or
2) command fails, in which case we expect "no such
container" in error output
For full coverage we should add a small delay-check test
to (1) to ensure that the container is cleaned up after
a short amount of time. Leaving that as a TODO because
it's more than my Go skills can handle, and I want to
get this checked in ASAP to get rid of the flake hassle.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'test/e2e')
-rw-r--r-- | test/e2e/logs_test.go | 20 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/test/e2e/logs_test.go b/test/e2e/logs_test.go index f9446e0c6..5d8ce24e9 100644 --- a/test/e2e/logs_test.go +++ b/test/e2e/logs_test.go @@ -283,10 +283,22 @@ var _ = Describe("Podman logs", func() { results.WaitWithDefaultTimeout() Expect(results).To(Exit(0)) - // Verify that the cleanup process worked correctly and we can recreate a container with the same name - logc = podmanTest.Podman([]string{"run", "--rm", "--name", containerName, "-dt", ALPINE, "true"}) - logc.WaitWithDefaultTimeout() - Expect(logc).To(Exit(0)) + // TODO: we should actually check for two podman lines, + // but as of 2020-06-17 there's a race condition in which + // 'logs -f' may not catch all output from a container + Expect(results.OutputToString()).To(ContainSubstring("podman")) + + // Container should now be terminatING or terminatED, but we + // have no guarantee of which: 'logs -f' does not necessarily + // wait for cleanup. Run 'inspect' and accept either state. + inspect := podmanTest.Podman([]string{"container", "inspect", "--format", "{{.State.Status}}", containerName}) + inspect.WaitWithDefaultTimeout() + if inspect.ExitCode() == 0 { + Expect(inspect.OutputToString()).To(Equal("exited")) + // TODO: add 2-second wait loop to confirm cleanup + } else { + Expect(inspect.ErrorToString()).To(ContainSubstring("no such container")) + } }) It("follow output stopped container", func() { |