With --rm option remove container if podman run fails

Fixes https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/15049

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test/system/030-run.bats b/test/system/030-run.bats
index d028a5ac7..908c169ee 100644
--- a/test/system/030-run.bats
+++ b/test/system/030-run.bats
@@ -871,4 +871,20 @@ EOF
     run_podman container rm -fa
 }
 
+@test "podman run failed --rm " {
+    port=$(random_free_port)
+
+    # Run two containers with the same port bindings. The second must fail
+    run_podman     run -p $port:80 --rm -d --name c_ok           $IMAGE top
+    run_podman 126 run -p $port:80      -d --name c_fail_no_rm   $IMAGE top
+    run_podman 126 run -p $port:80 --rm -d --name c_fail_with_rm $IMAGE top
+    # Prior to #15060, the third container would still show up in ps -a
+    run_podman ps -a --sort names --format '{{.Image}}--{{.Names}}'
+    is "$output" "$IMAGE--c_fail_no_rm
+$IMAGE--c_ok" \
+       "podman ps -a shows running & failed containers, but not failed-with-rm"
+
+    run_podman container rm -f -t 0 c_ok c_fail_no_rm
+}
+
 # vim: filetype=sh