diff options
author | Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com> | 2022-05-03 18:34:38 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com> | 2022-05-03 18:43:18 +0200 |
commit | 9166894c696582ee37893ce92a694ba227744fa0 (patch) | |
tree | 8b4c9ffa20de8a4a484c0a427fc74b5c22634994 /vendor/github.com/vbatts/git-validation/validate/rules.go | |
parent | 1e0c50df38ff955011f7ebb83a0268f3f1cd2841 (diff) | |
download | podman-9166894c696582ee37893ce92a694ba227744fa0.tar.gz podman-9166894c696582ee37893ce92a694ba227744fa0.tar.bz2 podman-9166894c696582ee37893ce92a694ba227744fa0.zip |
vendor test dependencies instead of installing via network
We can vendor the test dependencies such as go-md2man, git-validation
and goimports. This allows us to always install the same version as
specified in go.mod. Also we do not rely on a network connection for
this.
The advantage with this method is that dependabot will also update the
dependencies for us and we do not have to hardcode versions in the
Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'vendor/github.com/vbatts/git-validation/validate/rules.go')
-rw-r--r-- | vendor/github.com/vbatts/git-validation/validate/rules.go | 134 |
1 files changed, 134 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/vendor/github.com/vbatts/git-validation/validate/rules.go b/vendor/github.com/vbatts/git-validation/validate/rules.go new file mode 100644 index 000000000..38126a4f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/vendor/github.com/vbatts/git-validation/validate/rules.go @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ +package validate + +import ( + "sort" + "strings" + "sync" + + "github.com/vbatts/git-validation/git" +) + +var ( + // RegisteredRules are the avaible validation to perform on git commits + RegisteredRules = []Rule{} + registerRuleLock = sync.Mutex{} +) + +// RegisterRule includes the Rule in the avaible set to use +func RegisterRule(vr Rule) { + registerRuleLock.Lock() + defer registerRuleLock.Unlock() + RegisteredRules = append(RegisteredRules, vr) +} + +// Rule will operate over a provided git.CommitEntry, and return a result. +type Rule struct { + Name string // short name for reference in in the `-run=...` flag + Value string // value to configure for the rule (i.e. a regexp to check for in the commit message) + Description string // longer Description for readability + Run func(Rule, git.CommitEntry) Result + Default bool // whether the registered rule is run by default +} + +// Commit processes the given rules on the provided commit, and returns the result set. +func Commit(c git.CommitEntry, rules []Rule) Results { + results := Results{} + for _, r := range rules { + results = append(results, r.Run(r, c)) + } + return results +} + +// Result is the result for a single validation of a commit. +type Result struct { + CommitEntry git.CommitEntry + Pass bool + Msg string +} + +// Results is a set of results. This is type makes it easy for the following function. +type Results []Result + +// PassFail gives a quick over/under of passes and failures of the results in this set +func (vr Results) PassFail() (pass int, fail int) { + for _, res := range vr { + if res.Pass { + pass++ + } else { + fail++ + } + } + return pass, fail +} + +// SanitizeFilters takes a comma delimited list and returns the trimmend and +// split (on ",") items in the list +func SanitizeFilters(filtStr string) (filters []string) { + for _, item := range strings.Split(filtStr, ",") { + filters = append(filters, strings.TrimSpace(item)) + } + return +} + +// FilterRules takes a set of rules and a list of short names to include, and +// returns the reduced set. The comparison is case insensitive. +// +// Some `includes` rules have values assigned to them. +// i.e. -run "dco,message_regexp='^JIRA-[0-9]+ [A-Z].*$'" +// +func FilterRules(rules []Rule, includes []string) []Rule { + ret := []Rule{} + + for _, r := range rules { + for i := range includes { + if strings.Contains(includes[i], "=") { + chunks := strings.SplitN(includes[i], "=", 2) + if strings.ToLower(r.Name) == strings.ToLower(chunks[0]) { + // for these rules, the Name won't be unique per se. There may be + // multiple "regexp=" with different values. We'll need to set the + // .Value = chunk[1] and ensure r is dup'ed so they don't clobber + // each other. + newR := Rule(r) + newR.Value = chunks[1] + ret = append(ret, newR) + } + } else { + if strings.ToLower(r.Name) == strings.ToLower(includes[i]) { + ret = append(ret, r) + } + } + } + } + + return ret +} + +// StringsSliceEqual compares two string arrays for equality +func StringsSliceEqual(a, b []string) bool { + if !sort.StringsAreSorted(a) { + sort.Strings(a) + } + if !sort.StringsAreSorted(b) { + sort.Strings(b) + } + for i := range b { + if !StringsSliceContains(a, b[i]) { + return false + } + } + for i := range a { + if !StringsSliceContains(b, a[i]) { + return false + } + } + return true +} + +// StringsSliceContains checks for the presence of a word in string array +func StringsSliceContains(a []string, b string) bool { + if !sort.StringsAreSorted(a) { + sort.Strings(a) + } + i := sort.SearchStrings(a, b) + return i < len(a) && a[i] == b +} |