diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner/spec_runner_test.go')
| -rw-r--r-- | vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner/spec_runner_test.go | 785 |
1 files changed, 785 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner/spec_runner_test.go b/vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner/spec_runner_test.go new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a41437922 --- /dev/null +++ b/vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner/spec_runner_test.go @@ -0,0 +1,785 @@ +package specrunner_test + +import ( + . "github.com/onsi/ginkgo" + "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/spec_iterator" + . "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner" + "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/types" + . "github.com/onsi/gomega" + + "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/config" + "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/codelocation" + "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/containernode" + Failer "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/failer" + "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/leafnodes" + "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/spec" + Writer "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/writer" + "github.com/onsi/ginkgo/reporters" +) + +var noneFlag = types.FlagTypeNone +var pendingFlag = types.FlagTypePending + +var _ = Describe("Spec Runner", func() { + var ( + reporter1 *reporters.FakeReporter + reporter2 *reporters.FakeReporter + failer *Failer.Failer + writer *Writer.FakeGinkgoWriter + + thingsThatRan []string + + runner *SpecRunner + ) + + newBefSuite := func(text string, fail bool) leafnodes.SuiteNode { + return leafnodes.NewBeforeSuiteNode(func() { + writer.AddEvent(text) + thingsThatRan = append(thingsThatRan, text) + if fail { + failer.Fail(text, codelocation.New(0)) + } + }, codelocation.New(0), 0, failer) + } + + newAftSuite := func(text string, fail bool) leafnodes.SuiteNode { + return leafnodes.NewAfterSuiteNode(func() { + writer.AddEvent(text) + thingsThatRan = append(thingsThatRan, text) + if fail { + failer.Fail(text, codelocation.New(0)) + } + }, codelocation.New(0), 0, failer) + } + + newSpec := func(text string, flag types.FlagType, fail bool) *spec.Spec { + subject := leafnodes.NewItNode(text, func() { + writer.AddEvent(text) + thingsThatRan = append(thingsThatRan, text) + if fail { + failer.Fail(text, codelocation.New(0)) + } + }, flag, codelocation.New(0), 0, failer, 0) + + return spec.New(subject, []*containernode.ContainerNode{}, false) + } + + newFlakySpec := func(text string, flag types.FlagType, failures int) *spec.Spec { + runs := 0 + subject := leafnodes.NewItNode(text, func() { + writer.AddEvent(text) + thingsThatRan = append(thingsThatRan, text) + runs++ + if runs < failures { + failer.Fail(text, codelocation.New(0)) + } + }, flag, codelocation.New(0), 0, failer, 0) + + return spec.New(subject, []*containernode.ContainerNode{}, false) + } + + newSpecWithBody := func(text string, body interface{}) *spec.Spec { + subject := leafnodes.NewItNode(text, body, noneFlag, codelocation.New(0), 0, failer, 0) + + return spec.New(subject, []*containernode.ContainerNode{}, false) + } + + newRunner := func(config config.GinkgoConfigType, beforeSuiteNode leafnodes.SuiteNode, afterSuiteNode leafnodes.SuiteNode, specs ...*spec.Spec) *SpecRunner { + iterator := spec_iterator.NewSerialIterator(specs) + return New("description", beforeSuiteNode, iterator, afterSuiteNode, []reporters.Reporter{reporter1, reporter2}, writer, config) + } + + BeforeEach(func() { + reporter1 = reporters.NewFakeReporter() + reporter2 = reporters.NewFakeReporter() + writer = Writer.NewFake() + failer = Failer.New() + + thingsThatRan = []string{} + }) + + Describe("Running and Reporting", func() { + var specA, pendingSpec, anotherPendingSpec, failedSpec, specB, skippedSpec *spec.Spec + var willRunCalls, didCompleteCalls []string + var conf config.GinkgoConfigType + + JustBeforeEach(func() { + willRunCalls = []string{} + didCompleteCalls = []string{} + specA = newSpec("spec A", noneFlag, false) + pendingSpec = newSpec("pending spec", pendingFlag, false) + anotherPendingSpec = newSpec("another pending spec", pendingFlag, false) + failedSpec = newSpec("failed spec", noneFlag, true) + specB = newSpec("spec B", noneFlag, false) + skippedSpec = newSpec("skipped spec", noneFlag, false) + skippedSpec.Skip() + + reporter1.SpecWillRunStub = func(specSummary *types.SpecSummary) { + willRunCalls = append(willRunCalls, "Reporter1") + } + reporter2.SpecWillRunStub = func(specSummary *types.SpecSummary) { + willRunCalls = append(willRunCalls, "Reporter2") + } + + reporter1.SpecDidCompleteStub = func(specSummary *types.SpecSummary) { + didCompleteCalls = append(didCompleteCalls, "Reporter1") + } + reporter2.SpecDidCompleteStub = func(specSummary *types.SpecSummary) { + didCompleteCalls = append(didCompleteCalls, "Reporter2") + } + + runner = newRunner(conf, newBefSuite("BefSuite", false), newAftSuite("AftSuite", false), specA, pendingSpec, anotherPendingSpec, failedSpec, specB, skippedSpec) + runner.Run() + }) + + BeforeEach(func() { + conf = config.GinkgoConfigType{RandomSeed: 17} + }) + + It("should skip skipped/pending tests", func() { + Ω(thingsThatRan).Should(Equal([]string{"BefSuite", "spec A", "failed spec", "spec B", "AftSuite"})) + }) + + It("should report to any attached reporters", func() { + Ω(reporter1.Config).Should(Equal(reporter2.Config)) + Ω(reporter1.BeforeSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.BeforeSuiteSummary)) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.BeginSummary)) + Ω(reporter1.SpecWillRunSummaries).Should(Equal(reporter2.SpecWillRunSummaries)) + Ω(reporter1.SpecSummaries).Should(Equal(reporter2.SpecSummaries)) + Ω(reporter1.AfterSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.AfterSuiteSummary)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.EndSummary)) + }) + + It("should report that a spec did end in reverse order", func() { + Ω(willRunCalls[0:4]).Should(Equal([]string{"Reporter1", "Reporter2", "Reporter1", "Reporter2"})) + Ω(didCompleteCalls[0:4]).Should(Equal([]string{"Reporter2", "Reporter1", "Reporter2", "Reporter1"})) + }) + + It("should report the passed in config", func() { + Ω(reporter1.Config.RandomSeed).Should(BeNumerically("==", 17)) + }) + + It("should report the beginning of the suite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.SuiteDescription).Should(Equal("description")) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.SuiteID).Should(MatchRegexp("[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}")) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.NumberOfSpecsBeforeParallelization).Should(Equal(6)) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.NumberOfTotalSpecs).Should(Equal(6)) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.NumberOfSpecsThatWillBeRun).Should(Equal(3)) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.NumberOfPendingSpecs).Should(Equal(-1)) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.NumberOfSkippedSpecs).Should(Equal(-1)) + }) + + It("should report the end of the suite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteDescription).Should(Equal("description")) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeFalse()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteID).Should(MatchRegexp("[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}")) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSpecsBeforeParallelization).Should(Equal(6)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfTotalSpecs).Should(Equal(6)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSpecsThatWillBeRun).Should(Equal(3)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfPendingSpecs).Should(Equal(2)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSkippedSpecs).Should(Equal(1)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfPassedSpecs).Should(Equal(2)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfFailedSpecs).Should(Equal(1)) + }) + + Context("when told to perform a dry run", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + conf.DryRun = true + }) + + It("should report to the reporters", func() { + Ω(reporter1.Config).Should(Equal(reporter2.Config)) + Ω(reporter1.BeforeSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.BeforeSuiteSummary)) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.BeginSummary)) + Ω(reporter1.SpecWillRunSummaries).Should(Equal(reporter2.SpecWillRunSummaries)) + Ω(reporter1.SpecSummaries).Should(Equal(reporter2.SpecSummaries)) + Ω(reporter1.AfterSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.AfterSuiteSummary)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.EndSummary)) + }) + + It("should not actually run anything", func() { + Ω(thingsThatRan).Should(BeEmpty()) + }) + + It("report before and after suites as passed", func() { + Ω(reporter1.BeforeSuiteSummary.State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePassed)) + Ω(reporter1.AfterSuiteSummary.State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePassed)) + }) + + It("should report specs as passed", func() { + summaries := reporter1.SpecSummaries + Ω(summaries).Should(HaveLen(6)) + Ω(summaries[0].ComponentTexts).Should(ContainElement("spec A")) + Ω(summaries[0].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePassed)) + Ω(summaries[1].ComponentTexts).Should(ContainElement("pending spec")) + Ω(summaries[1].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePending)) + Ω(summaries[2].ComponentTexts).Should(ContainElement("another pending spec")) + Ω(summaries[2].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePending)) + Ω(summaries[3].ComponentTexts).Should(ContainElement("failed spec")) + Ω(summaries[3].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePassed)) + Ω(summaries[4].ComponentTexts).Should(ContainElement("spec B")) + Ω(summaries[4].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePassed)) + Ω(summaries[5].ComponentTexts).Should(ContainElement("skipped spec")) + Ω(summaries[5].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStateSkipped)) + }) + + It("should report the end of the suite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteDescription).Should(Equal("description")) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeTrue()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteID).Should(MatchRegexp("[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}")) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSpecsBeforeParallelization).Should(Equal(6)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfTotalSpecs).Should(Equal(6)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSpecsThatWillBeRun).Should(Equal(3)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfPendingSpecs).Should(Equal(2)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSkippedSpecs).Should(Equal(1)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfPassedSpecs).Should(Equal(0)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfFailedSpecs).Should(Equal(0)) + }) + + It("should not report a slow test", func() { + summaries := reporter1.SpecSummaries + for _, s := range summaries { + Expect(s.RunTime).To(BeZero()) + } + }) + }) + }) + + Describe("reporting on specs", func() { + var proceed chan bool + var ready chan bool + var finished chan bool + BeforeEach(func() { + ready = make(chan bool) + proceed = make(chan bool) + finished = make(chan bool) + skippedSpec := newSpec("SKIP", noneFlag, false) + skippedSpec.Skip() + + runner = newRunner( + config.GinkgoConfigType{}, + newBefSuite("BefSuite", false), + newAftSuite("AftSuite", false), + skippedSpec, + newSpec("PENDING", pendingFlag, false), + newSpecWithBody("RUN", func() { + close(ready) + <-proceed + }), + ) + go func() { + runner.Run() + close(finished) + }() + }) + + It("should report about pending/skipped specs", func() { + <-ready + Ω(reporter1.SpecWillRunSummaries).Should(HaveLen(3)) + + Ω(reporter1.SpecWillRunSummaries[0].ComponentTexts[0]).Should(Equal("SKIP")) + Ω(reporter1.SpecWillRunSummaries[1].ComponentTexts[0]).Should(Equal("PENDING")) + Ω(reporter1.SpecWillRunSummaries[2].ComponentTexts[0]).Should(Equal("RUN")) + + Ω(reporter1.SpecSummaries[0].ComponentTexts[0]).Should(Equal("SKIP")) + Ω(reporter1.SpecSummaries[1].ComponentTexts[0]).Should(Equal("PENDING")) + Ω(reporter1.SpecSummaries).Should(HaveLen(2)) + + close(proceed) + <-finished + + Ω(reporter1.SpecSummaries).Should(HaveLen(3)) + Ω(reporter1.SpecSummaries[2].ComponentTexts[0]).Should(Equal("RUN")) + }) + }) + + Describe("Running and Reporting when there's flakes", func() { + var specA, pendingSpec, flakySpec, failedSpec, specB, skippedSpec *spec.Spec + var willRunCalls, didCompleteCalls []string + var conf config.GinkgoConfigType + var failedSpecFlag = noneFlag + + JustBeforeEach(func() { + willRunCalls = []string{} + didCompleteCalls = []string{} + specA = newSpec("spec A", noneFlag, false) + pendingSpec = newSpec("pending spec", pendingFlag, false) + flakySpec = newFlakySpec("flaky spec", noneFlag, 3) + failedSpec = newSpec("failed spec", failedSpecFlag, true) + specB = newSpec("spec B", noneFlag, false) + skippedSpec = newSpec("skipped spec", noneFlag, false) + skippedSpec.Skip() + + reporter1.SpecWillRunStub = func(specSummary *types.SpecSummary) { + willRunCalls = append(willRunCalls, "Reporter1") + } + reporter2.SpecWillRunStub = func(specSummary *types.SpecSummary) { + willRunCalls = append(willRunCalls, "Reporter2") + } + + reporter1.SpecDidCompleteStub = func(specSummary *types.SpecSummary) { + didCompleteCalls = append(didCompleteCalls, "Reporter1") + } + reporter2.SpecDidCompleteStub = func(specSummary *types.SpecSummary) { + didCompleteCalls = append(didCompleteCalls, "Reporter2") + } + + runner = newRunner(conf, newBefSuite("BefSuite", false), newAftSuite("AftSuite", false), specA, pendingSpec, flakySpec, failedSpec, specB, skippedSpec) + runner.Run() + }) + + BeforeEach(func() { + failedSpecFlag = noneFlag + conf = config.GinkgoConfigType{ + RandomSeed: 17, + FlakeAttempts: 5, + } + }) + + It("should skip skipped/pending tests", func() { + Ω(thingsThatRan).Should(Equal([]string{"BefSuite", "spec A", "flaky spec", "flaky spec", "flaky spec", "failed spec", "failed spec", "failed spec", "failed spec", "failed spec", "spec B", "AftSuite"})) + }) + + It("should report to any attached reporters", func() { + Ω(reporter1.Config).Should(Equal(reporter2.Config)) + Ω(reporter1.BeforeSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.BeforeSuiteSummary)) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.BeginSummary)) + Ω(reporter1.SpecWillRunSummaries).Should(Equal(reporter2.SpecWillRunSummaries)) + Ω(reporter1.SpecSummaries).Should(Equal(reporter2.SpecSummaries)) + Ω(reporter1.AfterSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.AfterSuiteSummary)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.EndSummary)) + }) + + It("should report that a spec did end in reverse order", func() { + Ω(willRunCalls[0:4]).Should(Equal([]string{"Reporter1", "Reporter2", "Reporter1", "Reporter2"})) + Ω(didCompleteCalls[0:4]).Should(Equal([]string{"Reporter2", "Reporter1", "Reporter2", "Reporter1"})) + }) + + It("should report the passed in config", func() { + Ω(reporter1.Config.RandomSeed).Should(BeNumerically("==", 17)) + }) + + It("should report the beginning of the suite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.SuiteDescription).Should(Equal("description")) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.SuiteID).Should(MatchRegexp("[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}")) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.NumberOfSpecsBeforeParallelization).Should(Equal(6)) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.NumberOfTotalSpecs).Should(Equal(6)) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.NumberOfSpecsThatWillBeRun).Should(Equal(4)) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.NumberOfPendingSpecs).Should(Equal(-1)) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary.NumberOfSkippedSpecs).Should(Equal(-1)) + }) + + It("should report the end of the suite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteDescription).Should(Equal("description")) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeFalse()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteID).Should(MatchRegexp("[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}")) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSpecsBeforeParallelization).Should(Equal(6)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfTotalSpecs).Should(Equal(6)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSpecsThatWillBeRun).Should(Equal(4)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfPendingSpecs).Should(Equal(1)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSkippedSpecs).Should(Equal(1)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfPassedSpecs).Should(Equal(3)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfFailedSpecs).Should(Equal(1)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfFlakedSpecs).Should(Equal(1)) + }) + + Context("when nothing fails", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + failedSpecFlag = pendingFlag + }) + + It("the suite should pass even with flakes", func() { + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeTrue()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfFlakedSpecs).Should(Equal(1)) + }) + }) + + Context("when told to perform a dry run", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + conf.DryRun = true + }) + + It("should report to the reporters", func() { + Ω(reporter1.Config).Should(Equal(reporter2.Config)) + Ω(reporter1.BeforeSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.BeforeSuiteSummary)) + Ω(reporter1.BeginSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.BeginSummary)) + Ω(reporter1.SpecWillRunSummaries).Should(Equal(reporter2.SpecWillRunSummaries)) + Ω(reporter1.SpecSummaries).Should(Equal(reporter2.SpecSummaries)) + Ω(reporter1.AfterSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.AfterSuiteSummary)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary).Should(Equal(reporter2.EndSummary)) + }) + + It("should not actually run anything", func() { + Ω(thingsThatRan).Should(BeEmpty()) + }) + + It("report before and after suites as passed", func() { + Ω(reporter1.BeforeSuiteSummary.State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePassed)) + Ω(reporter1.AfterSuiteSummary.State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePassed)) + }) + + It("should report specs as passed", func() { + summaries := reporter1.SpecSummaries + Ω(summaries).Should(HaveLen(6)) + Ω(summaries[0].ComponentTexts).Should(ContainElement("spec A")) + Ω(summaries[0].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePassed)) + Ω(summaries[1].ComponentTexts).Should(ContainElement("pending spec")) + Ω(summaries[1].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePending)) + Ω(summaries[2].ComponentTexts).Should(ContainElement("flaky spec")) + Ω(summaries[2].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePassed)) + Ω(summaries[3].ComponentTexts).Should(ContainElement("failed spec")) + Ω(summaries[3].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePassed)) + Ω(summaries[4].ComponentTexts).Should(ContainElement("spec B")) + Ω(summaries[4].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStatePassed)) + Ω(summaries[5].ComponentTexts).Should(ContainElement("skipped spec")) + Ω(summaries[5].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStateSkipped)) + }) + + It("should report the end of the suite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteDescription).Should(Equal("description")) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeTrue()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteID).Should(MatchRegexp("[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}")) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSpecsBeforeParallelization).Should(Equal(6)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfTotalSpecs).Should(Equal(6)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSpecsThatWillBeRun).Should(Equal(4)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfPendingSpecs).Should(Equal(1)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSkippedSpecs).Should(Equal(1)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfPassedSpecs).Should(Equal(0)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfFailedSpecs).Should(Equal(0)) + }) + }) + }) + + Describe("Running BeforeSuite & AfterSuite", func() { + var success bool + var befSuite leafnodes.SuiteNode + var aftSuite leafnodes.SuiteNode + Context("with a nil BeforeSuite & AfterSuite", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + runner = newRunner( + config.GinkgoConfigType{}, + nil, + nil, + newSpec("A", noneFlag, false), + newSpec("B", noneFlag, false), + ) + success = runner.Run() + }) + + It("should not report about the BeforeSuite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.BeforeSuiteSummary).Should(BeNil()) + }) + + It("should not report about the AfterSuite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.AfterSuiteSummary).Should(BeNil()) + }) + + It("should run the specs", func() { + Ω(thingsThatRan).Should(Equal([]string{"A", "B"})) + }) + }) + + Context("when the BeforeSuite & AfterSuite pass", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + befSuite = newBefSuite("BefSuite", false) + aftSuite = newBefSuite("AftSuite", false) + runner = newRunner( + config.GinkgoConfigType{}, + befSuite, + aftSuite, + newSpec("A", noneFlag, false), + newSpec("B", noneFlag, false), + ) + success = runner.Run() + }) + + It("should run the BeforeSuite, the AfterSuite and the specs", func() { + Ω(thingsThatRan).Should(Equal([]string{"BefSuite", "A", "B", "AftSuite"})) + }) + + It("should report about the BeforeSuite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.BeforeSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(befSuite.Summary())) + }) + + It("should report about the AfterSuite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.AfterSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(aftSuite.Summary())) + }) + + It("should report success", func() { + Ω(success).Should(BeTrue()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeTrue()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfFailedSpecs).Should(Equal(0)) + }) + + It("should not dump the writer", func() { + Ω(writer.EventStream).ShouldNot(ContainElement("DUMP")) + }) + }) + + Context("when the BeforeSuite fails", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + befSuite = newBefSuite("BefSuite", true) + aftSuite = newBefSuite("AftSuite", false) + + skipped := newSpec("Skipped", noneFlag, false) + skipped.Skip() + + runner = newRunner( + config.GinkgoConfigType{}, + befSuite, + aftSuite, + newSpec("A", noneFlag, false), + newSpec("B", noneFlag, false), + newSpec("Pending", pendingFlag, false), + skipped, + ) + success = runner.Run() + }) + + It("should not run the specs, but it should run the AfterSuite", func() { + Ω(thingsThatRan).Should(Equal([]string{"BefSuite", "AftSuite"})) + }) + + It("should report about the BeforeSuite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.BeforeSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(befSuite.Summary())) + }) + + It("should report about the AfterSuite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.AfterSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(aftSuite.Summary())) + }) + + It("should report failure", func() { + Ω(success).Should(BeFalse()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeFalse()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfFailedSpecs).Should(Equal(2)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSpecsThatWillBeRun).Should(Equal(2)) + }) + + It("should dump the writer", func() { + Ω(writer.EventStream).Should(ContainElement("DUMP")) + }) + }) + + Context("when some other test fails", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + aftSuite = newBefSuite("AftSuite", false) + + runner = newRunner( + config.GinkgoConfigType{}, + nil, + aftSuite, + newSpec("A", noneFlag, true), + ) + success = runner.Run() + }) + + It("should still run the AfterSuite", func() { + Ω(thingsThatRan).Should(Equal([]string{"A", "AftSuite"})) + }) + + It("should report about the AfterSuite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.AfterSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(aftSuite.Summary())) + }) + + It("should report failure", func() { + Ω(success).Should(BeFalse()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeFalse()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfFailedSpecs).Should(Equal(1)) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSpecsThatWillBeRun).Should(Equal(1)) + }) + }) + + Context("when the AfterSuite fails", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + befSuite = newBefSuite("BefSuite", false) + aftSuite = newBefSuite("AftSuite", true) + runner = newRunner( + config.GinkgoConfigType{}, + befSuite, + aftSuite, + newSpec("A", noneFlag, false), + newSpec("B", noneFlag, false), + ) + success = runner.Run() + }) + + It("should run everything", func() { + Ω(thingsThatRan).Should(Equal([]string{"BefSuite", "A", "B", "AftSuite"})) + }) + + It("should report about the BeforeSuite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.BeforeSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(befSuite.Summary())) + }) + + It("should report about the AfterSuite", func() { + Ω(reporter1.AfterSuiteSummary).Should(Equal(aftSuite.Summary())) + }) + + It("should report failure", func() { + Ω(success).Should(BeFalse()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeFalse()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfFailedSpecs).Should(Equal(0)) + }) + + It("should dump the writer", func() { + Ω(writer.EventStream).Should(ContainElement("DUMP")) + }) + }) + }) + + Describe("When instructed to fail fast", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + conf := config.GinkgoConfigType{ + FailFast: true, + } + runner = newRunner(conf, nil, newAftSuite("after-suite", false), newSpec("passing", noneFlag, false), newSpec("failing", noneFlag, true), newSpec("dont-see", noneFlag, true), newSpec("dont-see", noneFlag, true)) + }) + + It("should return false, report failure, and not run anything past the failing test", func() { + Ω(runner.Run()).Should(BeFalse()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeFalse()) + Ω(thingsThatRan).Should(Equal([]string{"passing", "failing", "after-suite"})) + }) + + It("should announce the subsequent specs as skipped", func() { + runner.Run() + Ω(reporter1.SpecSummaries).Should(HaveLen(4)) + Ω(reporter1.SpecSummaries[2].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStateSkipped)) + Ω(reporter1.SpecSummaries[3].State).Should(Equal(types.SpecStateSkipped)) + }) + + It("should mark all subsequent specs as skipped", func() { + runner.Run() + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.NumberOfSkippedSpecs).Should(Equal(2)) + }) + }) + + Describe("Marking failure and success", func() { + Context("when all tests pass", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + runner = newRunner(config.GinkgoConfigType{}, nil, nil, newSpec("passing", noneFlag, false), newSpec("pending", pendingFlag, false)) + }) + + It("should return true and report success", func() { + Ω(runner.Run()).Should(BeTrue()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeTrue()) + }) + }) + + Context("when a test fails", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + runner = newRunner(config.GinkgoConfigType{}, nil, nil, newSpec("failing", noneFlag, true), newSpec("pending", pendingFlag, false)) + }) + + It("should return false and report failure", func() { + Ω(runner.Run()).Should(BeFalse()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeFalse()) + }) + }) + + Context("when there is a pending test, but pendings count as failures", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + runner = newRunner(config.GinkgoConfigType{FailOnPending: true}, nil, nil, newSpec("passing", noneFlag, false), newSpec("pending", pendingFlag, false)) + }) + + It("should return false and report failure", func() { + Ω(runner.Run()).Should(BeFalse()) + Ω(reporter1.EndSummary.SuiteSucceeded).Should(BeFalse()) + }) + }) + }) + + Describe("Managing the writer", func() { + BeforeEach(func() { + runner = newRunner( + config.GinkgoConfigType{}, + nil, + nil, + newSpec("A", noneFlag, false), + newSpec("B", noneFlag, true), + newSpec("C", noneFlag, false), + ) + reporter1.SpecWillRunStub = func(specSummary *types.SpecSummary) { + writer.AddEvent("R1.WillRun") + } + reporter2.SpecWillRunStub = func(specSummary *types.SpecSummary) { + writer.AddEvent("R2.WillRun") + } + reporter1.SpecDidCompleteStub = func(specSummary *types.SpecSummary) { + writer.AddEvent("R1.DidComplete") + } + reporter2.SpecDidCompleteStub = func(specSummary *types.SpecSummary) { + writer.AddEvent("R2.DidComplete") + } + runner.Run() + }) + + It("should truncate between tests, but only dump if a test fails", func() { + Ω(writer.EventStream).Should(Equal([]string{ + "TRUNCATE", + "R1.WillRun", + "R2.WillRun", + "A", + "R2.DidComplete", + "R1.DidComplete", + "TRUNCATE", + "R1.WillRun", + "R2.WillRun", + "B", + "BYTES", + "R2.DidComplete", + "DUMP", + "R1.DidComplete", + "TRUNCATE", + "R1.WillRun", + "R2.WillRun", + "C", + "R2.DidComplete", + "R1.DidComplete", + })) + }) + }) + + Describe("CurrentSpecSummary", func() { + It("should return the spec summary for the currently running spec", func() { + var summary *types.SpecSummary + runner = newRunner( + config.GinkgoConfigType{}, + nil, + nil, + newSpec("A", noneFlag, false), + newSpecWithBody("B", func() { + var ok bool + summary, ok = runner.CurrentSpecSummary() + Ω(ok).Should(BeTrue()) + }), + newSpec("C", noneFlag, false), + ) + runner.Run() + + Ω(summary.ComponentTexts).Should(Equal([]string{"B"})) + + summary, ok := runner.CurrentSpecSummary() + Ω(summary).Should(BeNil()) + Ω(ok).Should(BeFalse()) + }) + }) + + Describe("generating a suite id", func() { + It("should generate an id randomly", func() { + runnerA := newRunner(config.GinkgoConfigType{}, nil, nil) + runnerA.Run() + IDA := reporter1.BeginSummary.SuiteID + + runnerB := newRunner(config.GinkgoConfigType{}, nil, nil) + runnerB.Run() + IDB := reporter1.BeginSummary.SuiteID + + IDRegexp := "[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}" + Ω(IDA).Should(MatchRegexp(IDRegexp)) + Ω(IDB).Should(MatchRegexp(IDRegexp)) + + Ω(IDA).ShouldNot(Equal(IDB)) + }) + }) +}) |