| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
@cevich recently renamed all the files named Dockerfile to Containerfile
in this directory. Touching up the README.md to reflect that.
Also, as I was doing the submit, I noticed a couple of nits in the PR
request template and cleaned those up.
Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat <tsweeney@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Initial step toward automating the collection & generation
of release notes: add a markdown release-note block to our
PR template. This will be reaped by an existing Kubernetes
tool and gathered into a document that can be used as a
starting point for future releases.
Many more followup steps to come.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
we are not using any of the metadata in the new format, so we have
only the downside that is more annoying to fill.
[CI:DOCS] no need to run the CI
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This duplicates the template used for buildah. The intention
is to make it immediately clear to reviewers:
* The intended/basic purpose of the PR (also machine readable)
* Why are changes being proposed
* If there are any specific items need additional checking or scrutiny
* What should go into the release-notes (if anything).
Signed-off-by: Chris Evich <cevich@redhat.com>
|
|
|
Add a pull-request template that points to the section in the
contributing guidelines and to remind users to use the `[CI:DOCS]`
prefix if applicable.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
