| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR #8147 made things worse: it's not valid YAML. This at
least is valid YAML. I have no idea if it yields the
desired result, and we won't even know until it gets
merged, but at least it won't cause fatal syntax errors.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The action fails on the master branch as the regex does not match.
The error in this scenario is unfortunate and not of much value as
we do not want to change PR titles on the master branch.
To fix it, entirely disable the action on the master branch which
in restrospective may be a better approach as we do not fire off the
action.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a GitHub action to add the name of the target branch as prefix to
the title of a pull request. It is easy to miss the target of a given
pull request which has already caused issues of commits going into
non-main branches without intention.
We have already used this action on the `v2.0.5-rhel` branch with
limited success. Fortunately, the upstream implemented our feature
request to support adding the _target_ branch name (rather than the
source) to the PR title, which is what we need.
Any non-main branch from this commit forward will now be clearly marked.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Update the GitHub action to mark issues and PRs as stale. There are a
couple of useful features, most importantly, the bot will remove the
stale label from issues as soon as there's either an activity or a
comment.
This reduces some manual overhead: the stale bot will only drop a
comment on issues and PRs that are not marked as stale. Hence, as we
appreciated the reminders, we had to manually remove the label which
should now turn into campfire tales.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rephrase the stale message to be friendlier and bump the closing time to
365 days. The docs of the stale workflow do not indicate whether we can
not close, so a limit of 365 days seems fair.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Without the label, issues would be closed regardless of the
"do-not-close" label.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
|
Add a GitHub action to mark issues and PRs as stale and
to eventually close them after a grace period.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|