| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adding a couple of more community members to the OWNERS file.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
@Luap99 is a long-term contributor, does a lot of reviews, contributed
many non-trivial patches, and is very active in the community.
Being in the OWNERS file gives privileges to approve (/approve) and
merge (/lgtm) pull requests.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lets add Urvashi to podman OWNERS so she can review and merge PRs.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
update owners file to reflect more active contributors.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I keep forgetting to /approve PRs as Ed really doesn't need an explicit
approval.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Can't see any reason for a difference here. If you can review, you can approve.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Openshift bot assigns reviewers to each PR seemingly based on
this file, which means right now it's picking runcom and jwhonce
to review every PR, not our maintainers. Set said maintainers as
reviewers instead.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Closes: #894
Approved by: @TomSweeneyRedHat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As CRI-O did in [1]. 'assignees' is deprecated and 'approvers' is
effectively the same thing [2].
[1]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/pull/1103
[2]: https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/3851
Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Closes: #688
Approved by: rhatdan
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@gmail.com>
|