| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Can't see any reason for a difference here. If you can review, you can approve.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Openshift bot assigns reviewers to each PR seemingly based on
this file, which means right now it's picking runcom and jwhonce
to review every PR, not our maintainers. Set said maintainers as
reviewers instead.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Closes: #894
Approved by: @TomSweeneyRedHat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As CRI-O did in [1]. 'assignees' is deprecated and 'approvers' is
effectively the same thing [2].
[1]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/pull/1103
[2]: https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/3851
Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Closes: #688
Approved by: rhatdan
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@gmail.com>
|