| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Several podman commands accept no subcommands. Some
of those were not actually checking, though, which
could lead to user confusion. Added validation where
missing; and, refactored to minimize duplication.
(Side note: I decided against using cobra.NoArgs
because its error message, "unknown command",
misleadingly implies that there are known ones).
Also added validation to varlink
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The original intent behind the requirement was to ensure that, if
two SHM lock structs were open at the same time, we should not
make such a runtime available to the user, and should clean it up
instead.
It turns out that we don't even need to open a second SHM lock
struct - if we get an error mapping the first one due to a lock
count mismatch, we can just delete it, and it cleans itself up
when it errors. So there's no reason not to return a valid
runtime.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
|
|
This command allows for renumbering Podman locks after an upgrade
to Podman with SHM locks from a 1.0 or earlier branch, or after
the number of locks was changed.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
|