| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Write a description to outline the scope and mechanism of runlabel.
* Describe the variables/attributes that we want to be used.
* Do not describe the --optN or OPTN flags/variables since they are
already hidden flags and date back to the Atomic days.
* Update references to other man pages.
* Remove unsupported variables (e.g., SUDO_*) which caused confusion.
Fixes: #10799
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
First, make podman diff accept optionally a second argument. This allows
the user to specify a second image/container to compare the first with.
If it is not set the parent layer will be used as before.
Second, podman container diff should only use containers and podman
image diff should only use images. Previously, podman container diff
would use the image when both an image and container with this name
exists.
To make this work two new parameters have been added to the api. If they
are not used the previous behaviour is used. The same applies to the
bindings.
Fixes #10649
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic theory: We remove the container, but *only from the DB*.
We leave it in c/storage, we leave the lock allocated, we leave
it running (if it is). Then we create an identical container with
an altered name, and add that back to the database. Theoretically
we now have a renamed container.
The advantage of this approach is that it doesn't just apply to
rename - we can use this to make *any* configuration change to a
container that does not alter its container ID.
Potential problems are numerous. This process is *THOROUGHLY*
non-atomic at present - if you `kill -9` Podman mid-rename things
will be in a bad place, for example. Also, we can't rename
containers that can't be removed normally - IE, containers with
dependencies (pod infra containers, for example).
The largest potential improvement will be to move the majority of
the work into the DB, with a `RecreateContainer()` method - that
will add atomicity, and let us remove the container without
worrying about depencies and similar issues.
Potential problems: long-running processes that edit the DB and
may have an older version of the configuration around. Most
notable example is `podman run --rm` - the removal command needed
to be manually edited to avoid this one. This begins to get at
the heart of me not wanting to do this in the first place...
This provides CLI and API implementations for frontend, but no
tunnel implementation. It will be added in a future release (just
held back for time now - we need this in 3.0 and are running low
on time).
This is honestly kind of horrifying, but I think it will work.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This command exists in docker and is also in our documentation.
Also remove mentions of `podman ls` or `podman list`. These
commands do not exists in podman or docker.
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <paul.holzinger@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We should default to the user name unmount rather then the internal
name of umount.
Also User namespace was not being handled correctly. We want to inform
the user that if they do a mount when in rootless mode that they have
to be first in the podman unshare state.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
|
|
|
* Refactored code and Makefile to support new docs layout
* Removed some old code packaging code
* Add Readme.md to document what we're doing
Signed-off-by: Jhon Honce <jhonce@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
