| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Refactor the --authfile option.
My suggestion for review:
1) run hack/markdown-preprocess-review and immediately Ctrl-Q to
quit out of diffuse, which is completely unusable for this
many files; then
2) cd /tmp/markdown-preprocess-review.diffs/authfile
- this is the directory created by the review script
3) rm podman-image-sign* podman-log* podman-search.1.md.in
- because they're essentially identical to podman-create
4) rm podman-manifest-* podman-push.*
- because they're 100% identical to podman-kube-play
5) rm podman-kube-play*
- because it's apart-from-whitespace identical to podman-build
(use "wdiff" to confirm)
6) rm podman-auto-update*
- because that's the one I chose (hence == zzz-chosen.md)
(You should obviously run your own diff/cmp before rm, to confirm
my assertions about which files are identical).
After all that, you have a manageable number of files which
you can scan, read, diff against zzz-chosen.md, even run diffuse.
This option is IMHO the poster child for why we need this kind
of man page refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Refactor the --annotation option, but only between podman create,
kube play, and run.
This does not include:
* podman build:
- usage is in terms of images, not containers/pods
* manifest add, manifest annotate:
- usage is in terms of images, not containers/pods
- also, wording is slightly different
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Smaller, more reviewable chunks.
This is just one option, --arch. Future PRs may, if the reviewing
is easy, include multiple options. This one includes fixes to
the preprocessor script, though:
* big oops, I was not handling '<<something pod|something>>'
where 'pod' appears other than the beginning of the string.
* I was also not handling 'container<<| or pod>>', where one
side was empty.
* Behavior change: <<subcommand>>, on podman-pod-foo,
becomes just 'foo' (not 'pod foo'). This will be useful
in a future PR where we refactor --pod-id-file.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Continued. Harder-to-review ones this time.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Followup to #15174. These are the options that are easy(ish)
to review: those that have only drifted slightly, and need
only minor tweaks to bring back to sanity. For the most part,
I went with the text in podman-run because that was cleaned up
in #5192 way back in 2020. These diffs primarily consist of
using '**' (star star) instead of backticks, plus other
formatting and punctuation changes.
This PR also adds a README in the options dir, and a new
convention: <<container text...|pod text...>> which tries
to do the right thing based on whether the man page name
includes "-pod-" or not. Since that's kind of hairy code,
I've also added a test suite for it.
Finally, since this is impossible to review by normal means,
I'm temporarily committing hack/markdown-preprocess-review,
a script that will diff option-by-option. I will remove it
once we finish this cleanup, but be advised that there are
still 130+ options left to examine, and some of those are
going to be really hard to reunite.
Review script usage: simply run it (you need to have 'diffuse'
installed). It isn't exactly obvious, but it shouldn't take more
than a minute to figure out. The rightmost column (zzz-chosen.md)
is the "winner", the actual content that will be used henceforth.
You really want an ultrawide screen here.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
|
|
podman-create and -run have many options in common. To date,
these are copy-pasted and haphazardly maintained.
Solution: add an include mechanism, '@@option foo', such
that multiple md source files can fetch from one common file.
This is a Phase One commit, a very small subset of what's
possible. Purpose of this commit is ease of review. If this
passes review, much more (trickier stuff) will be forthcoming.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
