aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/source/markdown/podman-pull.1.md.in
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Man pages: refactor common options: --variantEd Santiago2022-10-03
| | | | | | | | | | Two different texts, split into two .md files. Nontrivial, but still easy to review because the text is unchanged. I was unable to reconcile either version with podman-build, so that file remains with a separate version. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* Man pages: refactor common options: --tls-verifyEd Santiago2022-09-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ugh. This had about five different variations among twelve files. I went with the version from podman-create, kube play, login, pull, push, run. The others: - manifest-add and create did not include the "true, false, missing" text. Now they do. (If this text is N/A to these two, please yell). Also, these two were written with "talking" instead of "contacting" the registry. - podman-build had "does not work with remote", but this does not seem to be true, so I removed it. None of the other files had that. - the wording in podman-search is just weird, with "if needed" and "is listed" and unclear "insecure registries". I just nuked it all. If that wording was deliberate, for some reason that applies only to podman-search, please yell. - podman-container-runlabel has one diff that I like, actually spelling out containers-registries.conf(5), but incorporating that would make this even harder to review. I will add that to my in-progress doc-cleanup PR. Review recommendation: run hack/markdown-preprocess-review but just quit out of it immediately (on both popups). Ignore it completely. Then cd /tmp/markdown-preprocess-review.diffs/tls-verify and run $ clear;for i in podman-*;do echo;echo $i;wdiff -t $i zzz-chosen.md;done This will show the major diffs between each version and the chosen one. Assumes you have wdiff installed. If you have another colorize-actual- individual-word-diffs tool installed, use that. I like cdif[1]. [1] https://github.com/kaz-utashiro/sdif-tools Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* Man pages: refactor common options: --os (pull)Ed Santiago2022-09-13
| | | | | | | | | | | Only shared by podman-create, -pull, -run. No changes made other than whitespace, so this should be a gimme. podman-build, import, and manifest-* also have --os options, but those are unrelated and I can't find a way to combine any two of them. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* Fix manpage headersAndrew Denton2022-09-06
| | | | Signed-off-by: Andrew Denton <adenton@redhat.com>
* Man pages: refactor common options: --disable-content-trustEd Santiago2022-08-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | A NOP option. I chose the container word, of course, and the word 'option' instead of 'flag'. I also hyphenated where needed. I'm choosing to eliminate the "not on remote" text, because I don't think it's true: podman-remote happily accepts that flag on all those commands, including build. (It's marked as hidden on build, but still accepted). Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* Merge pull request #15412 from edsantiago/docs_dedup_credsOpenShift Merge Robot2022-08-22
|\ | | | | Man pages: refactor common options: --creds
| * Man pages: refactor common options: --credsEd Santiago2022-08-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Refactor the --creds option. I went with the one in podman-pull The main difference between all of them is the '####' line, differences in the param descriptions. podman-pull had the clearest one. This is another one that hack/markdown-preprocess-review is good for reviewing. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* | Merge pull request #15409 from vrothberg/fix-15300OpenShift Merge Robot2022-08-22
|\ \ | |/ |/| [CI:DOCS] elaborate on image lookups of foreign platforms
| * [CI:DOCS] elaborate on image lookups of foreign platformsValentin Rothberg2022-08-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | After pulling/creating an image of a foreign platform, Podman will happily use it when looking it up in the local storage and will not pull down the image matching the host platform. As discussed in #12682, the reasoning for it is Docker compatibility and the fact that user already rely on the behavior. While Podman is now emitting a warning when an image is in use not matching the local platform, the documentation was lacking that information. Fixes: #15300 Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <vrothberg@redhat.com>
* | Man pages: refactor common options: cert-dirEd Santiago2022-08-22
|/ | | | | | | ...and, tweak markdown-process-review so it can detect and remove identical files, making review easier. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* Man pages: refactor common options: authfileEd Santiago2022-08-16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Refactor the --authfile option. My suggestion for review: 1) run hack/markdown-preprocess-review and immediately Ctrl-Q to quit out of diffuse, which is completely unusable for this many files; then 2) cd /tmp/markdown-preprocess-review.diffs/authfile - this is the directory created by the review script 3) rm podman-image-sign* podman-log* podman-search.1.md.in - because they're essentially identical to podman-create 4) rm podman-manifest-* podman-push.* - because they're 100% identical to podman-kube-play 5) rm podman-kube-play* - because it's apart-from-whitespace identical to podman-build (use "wdiff" to confirm) 6) rm podman-auto-update* - because that's the one I chose (hence == zzz-chosen.md) (You should obviously run your own diff/cmp before rm, to confirm my assertions about which files are identical). After all that, you have a manageable number of files which you can scan, read, diff against zzz-chosen.md, even run diffuse. This option is IMHO the poster child for why we need this kind of man page refactoring. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* Man pages: refactor common options: archEd Santiago2022-08-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Smaller, more reviewable chunks. This is just one option, --arch. Future PRs may, if the reviewing is easy, include multiple options. This one includes fixes to the preprocessor script, though: * big oops, I was not handling '<<something pod|something>>' where 'pod' appears other than the beginning of the string. * I was also not handling 'container<<| or pod>>', where one side was empty. * Behavior change: <<subcommand>>, on podman-pod-foo, becomes just 'foo' (not 'pod foo'). This will be useful in a future PR where we refactor --pod-id-file. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* Refactor common man page options, phase 2Ed Santiago2022-08-09
Followup to #15174. These are the options that are easy(ish) to review: those that have only drifted slightly, and need only minor tweaks to bring back to sanity. For the most part, I went with the text in podman-run because that was cleaned up in #5192 way back in 2020. These diffs primarily consist of using '**' (star star) instead of backticks, plus other formatting and punctuation changes. This PR also adds a README in the options dir, and a new convention: <<container text...|pod text...>> which tries to do the right thing based on whether the man page name includes "-pod-" or not. Since that's kind of hairy code, I've also added a test suite for it. Finally, since this is impossible to review by normal means, I'm temporarily committing hack/markdown-preprocess-review, a script that will diff option-by-option. I will remove it once we finish this cleanup, but be advised that there are still 130+ options left to examine, and some of those are going to be really hard to reunite. Review script usage: simply run it (you need to have 'diffuse' installed). It isn't exactly obvious, but it shouldn't take more than a minute to figure out. The rightmost column (zzz-chosen.md) is the "winner", the actual content that will be used henceforth. You really want an ultrawide screen here. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>