summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/libpod/container_validate.go
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* rootless: support `podman network create` (CNI-in-slirp4netns)Akihiro Suda2020-09-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Usage: ``` $ podman network create foo $ podman run -d --name web --hostname web --network foo nginx:alpine $ podman run --rm --network foo alpine wget -O - http://web.dns.podman Connecting to web.dns.podman (10.88.4.6:80) ... <h1>Welcome to nginx!</h1> ... ``` See contrib/rootless-cni-infra for the design. Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <akihiro.suda.cz@hco.ntt.co.jp>
* Switch all references to github.com/containers/libpod -> podmanDaniel J Walsh2020-07-28
| | | | Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* Add support for overlay volume mounts in podman.Qi Wang2020-07-20
| | | | | | | | Add support -v for overlay volume mounts in podman. Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Qi Wang <qiwan@redhat.com>
* move go module to v2Valentin Rothberg2020-07-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | With the advent of Podman 2.0.0 we crossed the magical barrier of go modules. While we were able to continue importing all packages inside of the project, the project could not be vendored anymore from the outside. Move the go module to new major version and change all imports to `github.com/containers/libpod/v2`. The renaming of the imports was done via `gomove` [1]. [1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
* podman: add new cgroup mode splitGiuseppe Scrivano2020-06-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When running under systemd there is no need to create yet another cgroup for the container. With conmon-delegated the current cgroup will be split in two sub cgroups: - supervisor - container The supervisor cgroup will hold conmon and the podman process, while the container cgroup is used by the OCI runtime (using the cgroupfs backend). Closes: https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/6400 Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
* Add validate() for containersMatthew Heon2020-03-02
Until now, we've been validating every part of container configuration through the With... functions that set the options. This if fine when we are just validating the options to an individual function, but things get complicated once we need to validate conflicts between different options. We don't know the order in which things were passed, so we need the validation on both of the potential options that can conflict, resulting in significant code duplication. To solve this, add a validate() function for containers, and use this to check whether everything is in a good state. We can probably move more into this function (there are other parts of container creation that also do validation of a sort) but this is a good start to simplifying our options. Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>