| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Podman is not the only user of containers/storage, and as such we
cannot rely on our database as the sole source of truth when
pruning images. If images do not show as in use from Podman's
perspective, but subsequently fail to remove because they are
being used by a container, they're probably being used by Buildah
or another c/storage client.
Since the images in question are in use, we shouldn't error on
failure to prune them - we weren't supposed to prune them in the
first place.
Fixes: #3983
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When removing --all images prune images only attempt to remove read/write images,
ignore read/only images
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a context.Context parameter to Image.GetParent(), Image.IsParent(),
Image.GetChildren(), Image.Remove(), and Runtime.PruneImages().
Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In lipod, we now log major events that occurr. These events
can be displayed using the `podman events` command. Each
event contains:
* Type (container, image, volume, pod...)
* Status (create, rm, stop, kill, ....)
* Timestamp in RFC3339Nano format
* Name (if applicable)
* Image (if applicable)
The format of the event and the varlink endpoint are to not
be considered stable until cockpit has done its enablement.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
we now, by default, only prune dangling images. if --all is passed, we
prune dangling images AND images that do not have an associated containers.
also went ahead and enabled the podman-remote image prune side of things.
Fixes: #2192
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
|
Allow user to prune unused/unnamed images, the layer images from building,
via podman rmi --prune.
Allow user to prune stopped/exiuted containers via podman rm --prune.
This should resolve #1910
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|