| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With the advent of Podman 2.0.0 we crossed the magical barrier of go
modules. While we were able to continue importing all packages inside
of the project, the project could not be vendored anymore from the
outside.
Move the go module to new major version and change all imports to
github.com/containers/libpod/v2. The renaming of the imports
was done via gomove [1].
[1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
using the factory approach similar to container, we now create pods based on a pod spec generator. wired up the podmanv2 pod create command, podcreatewithspec binding, simple binding test, and apiv2 endpoint.
also included some code refactoring as it introduced as easy circular import.
Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
add volume commands: create, inspect, ls, prune, and rm
Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can easily tell if we're going to deadlock by comparing lock
IDs before actually taking the lock. Add a few checks for this in
common places where deadlocks might occur.
This does not yet cover pod operations, where detection is more
difficult (and costly) due to the number of locks being involved
being higher than 2.
Also, add some error wrapping on the Podman side, so we can tell
people to use `system renumber` when it occurs.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@member.fsf.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This isn't included in Docker, but seems handy enough.
Use the new API for 'volume rm' and 'volume inspect'.
Fixes #3891
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will require a 'podman system renumber' after being applied
to get lock numbers for existing volumes.
Add the DB backend code for rewriting volume configs and use it
for updating lock numbers as part of 'system renumber'.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We should not be fuzzy matching on volume names. Docker doesn't
do it, and it doesn't make much sense. Everything requires exact
matches for names - only IDs allow partial matches.
Fixes #3635
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the compilation demands of having libpod in main is a burden for the
remote client compilations. to combat this, we should move the use of
libpod structs, vars, constants, and functions into the adapter code
where it will only be compiled by the local client.
this should result in cleaner code organization and smaller binaries. it
should also help if we ever need to compile the remote client on
non-Linux operating systems natively (not cross-compiled).
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In lipod, we now log major events that occurr. These events
can be displayed using the `podman events` command. Each
event contains:
* Type (container, image, volume, pod...)
* Status (create, rm, stop, kill, ....)
* Timestamp in RFC3339Nano format
* Name (if applicable)
* Image (if applicable)
The format of the event and the varlink endpoint are to not
be considered stable until cockpit has done its enablement.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I was looking into why we have locks in volumes, and I'm fairly
convinced they're unnecessary.
We don't have a state whose accesses we need to guard with locks
and syncs. The only real purpose for the lock was to prevent
concurrent removal of the same volume.
Looking at the code, concurrent removal ought to be fine with a
bit of reordering - one or the other might fail, but we will
successfully evict the volume from the state.
Also, remove the 'prune' bool from RemoveVolume. None of our
other API functions accept it, and it only served to toggle off
more verbose error messages.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
allow users to remotely prune volumes.
this is the last volume command for remote enablement. as such,
the volume commands are being folded back into main because they
are supported for both local and remote clients.
also, enable all volume tests that do not use containers
as containers are not enabled for the remote client yet.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
add the ability to remove/delete volumes with the podman remote
client.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
|
|
Add support for podman volume and its subcommands.
The commands supported are:
podman volume create
podman volume inspect
podman volume ls
podman volume rm
podman volume prune
This is a tool to manage volumes used by podman. For now it only handle
named volumes, but eventually it will handle all volumes used by podman.
Signed-off-by: umohnani8 <umohnani@redhat.com>
|
