| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I was looking into why we have locks in volumes, and I'm fairly
convinced they're unnecessary.
We don't have a state whose accesses we need to guard with locks
and syncs. The only real purpose for the lock was to prevent
concurrent removal of the same volume.
Looking at the code, concurrent removal ought to be fine with a
bit of reordering - one or the other might fail, but we will
successfully evict the volume from the state.
Also, remove the 'prune' bool from RemoveVolume. None of our
other API functions accept it, and it only served to toggle off
more verbose error messages.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
allow users to remotely prune volumes.
this is the last volume command for remote enablement. as such,
the volume commands are being folded back into main because they
are supported for both local and remote clients.
also, enable all volume tests that do not use containers
as containers are not enabled for the remote client yet.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
add the ability to remove/delete volumes with the podman remote
client.
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
|
|
Add support for podman volume and its subcommands.
The commands supported are:
podman volume create
podman volume inspect
podman volume ls
podman volume rm
podman volume prune
This is a tool to manage volumes used by podman. For now it only handle
named volumes, but eventually it will handle all volumes used by podman.
Signed-off-by: umohnani8 <umohnani@redhat.com>
|
