| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(Sorry, couldn't resist).
CI flakes have been coming down - thank you to everyone who has
been making them a priority.
This leaves a noisy subset that I've just been ignoring for months:
Running: podman ... -p 8080:something
...cannot listen on the TCP port: listen tcp4 :8080: bind: address already in use
Sometimes these are one-time errors resolved on 2nd try; sometimes
they fail three times, forcing CI user to hit Rerun. In all cases
they make noise in my flake logs, which costs me time.
My assumption is that this has to do with ginkgo running random
tests in parallel. Since many e2e tests simplemindedly use 8080,
collisions are inevitable.
Solution: simplemindedly replace 8080 with other (also arbitrarily
picked) numbers. This is imperfect -- it requires human developers
to pick a number NNNN and 'grep NNNN test/e2e/*' before adding
new tests, which I am 100% confident ain't gonna happen -- but
it's better than what we have now.
Side note: I considered writing and using a RandomAvailablePort()
helper, but that would still be racy. Plus, it would be a pain
to interpolate strings into so many places. Finally, with this
hand-tooled approach, if/when we _do_ get conflicts on port NNNN,
it should be very easy to grep for NNNN, find the offending tests
that reuse that port, and fix one of them.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Podman inspect has to show exposed ports to match docker. This requires
storing the exposed ports in the container config.
A exposed port is shown as `"80/tcp": null` while a forwarded port is
shown as `"80/tcp": [{"HostIp": "", "HostPort": "8080" }]`.
Also make sure to add the exposed ports to the new image when the
container is commited.
Fixes #10777
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
e2e test failures are rife with messages like:
Expected 1 to equal 0
These make me cry. They're anti-helpful, requiring the reader
to dive into the source code to figure out what those numbers
mean.
Solution: Go tests have a '.Should(Exit(NNN))' mechanism. I
don't know if it spits out a better diagnostic (I have no way
to run e2e tests on my laptop), but I have to fantasize that
it will, and given the state of our flakes I assume that at
least one test will fail and give me the opportunity to see
what the error message looks like.
THIS IS NOT REVIEWABLE CODE. There is no way for a human
to review it. Don't bother. Maybe look at a few random
ones for sanity. If you want to really review, here is
a reproducer of what I did:
cd test/e2e
! positive assertions. The second is the same as the first,
! with the addition of (unnecessary) parentheses because
! some invocations were written that way. The third is BeZero().
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit(0))/' *_test.go
! Same as above, but handles three non-numeric exit codes
! in run_exit_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\S+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go
! negative assertions. Difference is the spelling of 'To(Not)',
! 'ToNot', and 'NotTo'. I assume those are all the same.
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Not\(Equal\((0)\)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.NotTo\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
! negative, old use of BeZero()
perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go
Run those on a clean copy of main branch (at the same branch
point as my PR, of course), then diff against a checked-out
copy of my PR. There should be no differences. Then all you
have to review is that my replacements above are sane.
UPDATE: nope, that's not enough, you also need to add gomega/gexec
to the files that don't have it:
perl -pi -e '$_ .= "$1/gexec\"\n" if m!^(.*/onsi/gomega)"!' $(grep -L gomega/gexec $(git log -1 --stat | awk '$1 ~ /test\/e2e\// { print $1}'))
UPDATE 2: hand-edit run_volume_test.go
UPDATE 3: sigh, add WaitWithDefaultTimeout() to a couple of places
UPDATE 4: skip a test due to bug #10935 (race condition)
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We missed bumping the go module, so let's do it now :)
* Automated go code with github.com/sirkon/go-imports-rename
* Manually via `vgrep podman/v2` the rest
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With the advent of Podman 2.0.0 we crossed the magical barrier of go
modules. While we were able to continue importing all packages inside
of the project, the project could not be vendored anymore from the
outside.
Move the go module to new major version and change all imports to
`github.com/containers/libpod/v2`. The renaming of the imports
was done via `gomove` [1].
[1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
enable remote integration tests
Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Failing tests are now skipped and we should work from this.
Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
|
|
This change adds the following annotation to every container created by
podman:
```json
"Annotations": {
"io.containers.manager": "libpod"
}
```
Target of this annotaions is to indicate which project in the containers
ecosystem is the major manager of a container when applications share
the same storage paths. This way projects can decide if they want to
manipulate the container or not. For example, since CRI-O and podman are
not using the same container library (libpod), CRI-O can skip podman
containers and provide the end user more useful information.
A corresponding end-to-end test has been adapted as well.
Relates to: https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/pull/2761
Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@suse.com>
|
