summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/e2e/pod_inspect_test.go
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Eighty-six eighty-eightyEd Santiago2021-09-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Sorry, couldn't resist). CI flakes have been coming down - thank you to everyone who has been making them a priority. This leaves a noisy subset that I've just been ignoring for months: Running: podman ... -p 8080:something ...cannot listen on the TCP port: listen tcp4 :8080: bind: address already in use Sometimes these are one-time errors resolved on 2nd try; sometimes they fail three times, forcing CI user to hit Rerun. In all cases they make noise in my flake logs, which costs me time. My assumption is that this has to do with ginkgo running random tests in parallel. Since many e2e tests simplemindedly use 8080, collisions are inevitable. Solution: simplemindedly replace 8080 with other (also arbitrarily picked) numbers. This is imperfect -- it requires human developers to pick a number NNNN and 'grep NNNN test/e2e/*' before adding new tests, which I am 100% confident ain't gonna happen -- but it's better than what we have now. Side note: I considered writing and using a RandomAvailablePort() helper, but that would still be racy. Plus, it would be a pain to interpolate strings into so many places. Finally, with this hand-tooled approach, if/when we _do_ get conflicts on port NNNN, it should be very easy to grep for NNNN, find the offending tests that reuse that port, and fix one of them. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* e2e tests: use Should(Exit()) and ExitWithError()Ed Santiago2021-07-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | e2e test failures are rife with messages like: Expected 1 to equal 0 These make me cry. They're anti-helpful, requiring the reader to dive into the source code to figure out what those numbers mean. Solution: Go tests have a '.Should(Exit(NNN))' mechanism. I don't know if it spits out a better diagnostic (I have no way to run e2e tests on my laptop), but I have to fantasize that it will, and given the state of our flakes I assume that at least one test will fail and give me the opportunity to see what the error message looks like. THIS IS NOT REVIEWABLE CODE. There is no way for a human to review it. Don't bother. Maybe look at a few random ones for sanity. If you want to really review, here is a reproducer of what I did: cd test/e2e ! positive assertions. The second is the same as the first, ! with the addition of (unnecessary) parentheses because ! some invocations were written that way. The third is BeZero(). perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit(0))/' *_test.go ! Same as above, but handles three non-numeric exit codes ! in run_exit_test.go perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\S+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go ! negative assertions. Difference is the spelling of 'To(Not)', ! 'ToNot', and 'NotTo'. I assume those are all the same. perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Not\(Equal\((0)\)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.NotTo\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go ! negative, old use of BeZero() perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go Run those on a clean copy of main branch (at the same branch point as my PR, of course), then diff against a checked-out copy of my PR. There should be no differences. Then all you have to review is that my replacements above are sane. UPDATE: nope, that's not enough, you also need to add gomega/gexec to the files that don't have it: perl -pi -e '$_ .= "$1/gexec\"\n" if m!^(.*/onsi/gomega)"!' $(grep -L gomega/gexec $(git log -1 --stat | awk '$1 ~ /test\/e2e\// { print $1}')) UPDATE 2: hand-edit run_volume_test.go UPDATE 3: sigh, add WaitWithDefaultTimeout() to a couple of places UPDATE 4: skip a test due to bug #10935 (race condition) Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* bump go module to v3Valentin Rothberg2021-02-22
| | | | | | | | | We missed bumping the go module, so let's do it now :) * Automated go code with github.com/sirkon/go-imports-rename * Manually via `vgrep podman/v2` the rest Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
* Report StatusConflict on Pod opt partial failuresJhon Honce2021-02-02
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - When one or more containers in the Pod reports an error on an operation report StatusConflict and report the error(s) - jsoniter type encoding used to marshal error as string using error.Error() - Update test framework to allow setting any flag when creating pods - Fix test_resize() result check Fixes #8865 Signed-off-by: Jhon Honce <jhonce@redhat.com>
* Allow static ip and mac with rootless cni networkPaul Holzinger2021-01-27
| | | | | | | | Make sure we pass the ip and mac address as CNI_ARGS to the cnitool which is executed in the rootless-cni-infra container. Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <paul.holzinger@web.de>
* Fix podman pod inspect show wrong MAC stringzhangguanzhang2020-11-18
| | | | Signed-off-by: zhangguanzhang <zhangguanzhang@qq.com>
* Switch all references to github.com/containers/libpod -> podmanDaniel J Walsh2020-07-28
| | | | Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* Fix lintMatthew Heon2020-07-14
| | | | Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
* Include infra container information in `pod inspect`Matthew Heon2020-07-14
| | | | | | | | | | We had a field for this in the inspect data, but it was never being populated. Because of this, `podman pod inspect` stopped showing port bindings (and other infra container settings). Add code to populate the infra container inspect data, and add a test to ensure we don't regress again. Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
* Fix container and pod create commands for remote createMatthew Heon2020-07-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In `podman inspect` output for containers and pods, we include the command that was used to create the container. This is also used by `podman generate systemd --new` to generate unit files. With remote podman, the generated create commands were incorrect since we sourced directly from os.Args on the server side, which was guaranteed to be `podman system service` (or some variant thereof). The solution is to pass the command along in the Specgen or PodSpecgen, where we can source it from the client's os.Args. This will still be VERY iffy for mixed local/remote use (doing a `podman --remote run ...` on a remote client then a `podman generate systemd --new` on the server on the same container will not work, because the `--remote` flag will slip in) but at the very least the output of `podman inspect` will be correct. We can look into properly handling `--remote` (parsing it out would be a little iffy) in a future PR. Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
* Change buildtag for remoteclient to remote for testingDaniel J Walsh2020-07-06
| | | | Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* move go module to v2Valentin Rothberg2020-07-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | With the advent of Podman 2.0.0 we crossed the magical barrier of go modules. While we were able to continue importing all packages inside of the project, the project could not be vendored anymore from the outside. Move the go module to new major version and change all imports to `github.com/containers/libpod/v2`. The renaming of the imports was done via `gomove` [1]. [1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
* pod config: add a `CreateCommand` fieldValentin Rothberg2020-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a `CreateCommand` field to the pod config which includes the entire `os.Args` at pod-creation. Similar to the already existing field in a container config, we need this information to properly generate generic systemd unit files for pods. It's a prerequisite to support the `--new` flag for pods. Also add the `CreateCommand` to the pod-inspect data, which can come in handy for debugging, general inspection and certainly for the tests that are added along with the other changes. Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
* v2 enable remote integration testsBrent Baude2020-05-19
| | | | | | enable remote integration tests Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
* Enable pod inspect integration testSujil022020-04-26
| | | | | | | | Enable pod inspect integration test Get rid of libpod pod inspect references Remove libpod PodInspect struct. Signed-off-by: Sujil02 <sushah@redhat.com>
* Force integration tests to passBrent Baude2020-04-21
| | | | | | Failing tests are now skipped and we should work from this. Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
* podman v2 remove bloat v2Brent Baude2020-04-16
| | | | | | rid ourseleves of libpod references in v2 client Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
* Refactor tests when checking for error exit codesJhon Honce2019-10-16
| | | | | | | Rather than checking for non-zero, we need to check for >0 to distinguish between timeouts and error exit codes. Signed-off-by: Jhon Honce <jhonce@redhat.com>
* use imagecaches for local testsbaude2019-05-29
| | | | | | | | | when doing localized tests (not varlink), we can use secondary image stores as read-only image caches. this cuts down on test time significantly because each test does not need to restore the images from a tarball anymore. Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
* enable integration tests for remote-clientbaude2019-05-07
| | | | | | | first pass at enabling a swath of integration tests for the remote-client. Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
* ginkgo status improvementsbaude2019-03-08
| | | | | | | a series of improvements to our ginkgo test framework so we can get better ideas of whats going on when run in CI Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
* Run integrations test with remote-clientbaude2019-01-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | Add the ability to run the integration (ginkgo) suite using the remote client. Only the images_test.go file is run right now; all the rest are isolated with a // +build !remotelinux. As more content is developed for the remote client, we can unblock the files and just block single tests as needed. Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
* Separate common used test functions and structs to test/utilsYiqiao Pu2018-11-16
| | | | | | | Put common used test functions and structs to a separated package. So we can use them for more testsuites. Signed-off-by: Yiqiao Pu <ypu@redhat.com>
* Added option to share kernel namespaces in libpod and podmanhaircommander2018-08-23
| | | | | | | | | A pause container is added to the pod if the user opts in. The default pause image and command can be overridden. Pause containers are ignored in ps unless the -a option is present. Pod inspect and pod ps show shared namespaces and pause container. A pause container can't be removed with podman rm, and a pod can be removed if it only has a pause container. Signed-off-by: haircommander <pehunt@redhat.com> Closes: #1187 Approved by: mheon
* add podman pod inspectbaude2018-08-09
first pass of podman pod inspect Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com> Closes: #1236 Approved by: rhatdan
generated by cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf (git 2.39.0) at 2024-11-15 04:47:38 +0000