summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/e2e/rmi_test.go
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Separate common used test functions and structs to test/utilsYiqiao Pu2018-11-16
| | | | | | | Put common used test functions and structs to a separated package. So we can use them for more testsuites. Signed-off-by: Yiqiao Pu <ypu@redhat.com>
* allow ppc64le to pass libpod integration testsbaude2018-10-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | this pr allows the libpod integration suite to pass on the ppc64le architecture. in some cases, I had to skip tests. eventually, these tests need to be fixed so that they properly pass. of note for this PR is: * changed the ppc64le default container os to be overlay (over vfs) as vfs seems non-performant on ppc64le * still run vfs for rootless operations * some images names for ppc64le had to change because they don't exist. * this should help getting our CI to run on the platform Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
* rmi remove all not error when no images are presentbaude2018-09-05
| | | | | | | | | | When running podman rm -a on a storage where no images exist, the exit code should NOT be non-zero. Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com> Closes: #1402 Approved by: rhatdan
* Integration Test Improvements #3baude2018-08-01
| | | | | | | | | Third round of speed improvements to the integration tests. Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com> Closes: #1193 Approved by: rhatdan
* Show duration for each ginkgo test and test speed improvementsbaude2018-07-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Because our tests are getting so long, we want to be able to audit which tests are taking the longest to complete. This may indicate a bad test, bad CI, bad code, etc and therefore should be auditable. Also, make speed improvements to tests by making sure we only unpack caches images that actually get used. Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com> Closes: #1178 Approved by: mheon
* podman rmi shouldn't delete named referenced imagesumohnani82018-07-28
| | | | | | | | | | | If an image is created from another and it is deleted, only delete the actual image and not the parent images if the parent images have names/references. Signed-off-by: umohnani8 <umohnani@redhat.com> Closes: #1174 Approved by: mheon
* podman rmi should only untag image if parent of anotherumohnani82018-07-12
| | | | | | | | | | | | podman rmi was deleting an image even if it was a parent of another image. This fix just untags the image instead. This also fixes podman rmi to remove intermediate images of an image when the image is removed. Signed-off-by: umohnani8 <umohnani@redhat.com> Closes: #1055 Approved by: mheon
* Spell check strings and commentsJhon Honce2018-05-25
| | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Jhon Honce <jhonce@redhat.com> Closes: #831 Approved by: rhatdan
* Fix a typoYiqiao Pu2018-04-19
| | | | | | | | | Update LineInOuputContains to LineInOutputContains. Signed-off-by: Yiqiao Pu <ypu@redhat.com> Closes: #642 Approved by: rhatdan
* Removing tagged images change in behaviorbaude2018-03-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | An image name is really just a tag. When an image has multiple tags, we should be able to "delete" the one of its tags without harm. In this case, the "delete' is really a form of Untag (removing the tag from the image). If an image has multiple tags and the user tries to delete by ID without force, this should be denied because when you delete by ID there is no distinguishing it like image tags. Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com> Closes: #528 Approved by: mheon
* Ginkgo Tests: ps, pull, push and rmbaude2018-01-31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Migrate ps, pull, push, and rm from bats to ginkgo. Also, fixed a conditional issue with adding ports when an image defines the port and the user wants to override it. Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com> Closes: #277 Approved by: baude
* Initial gingko workbaude2018-01-29
This implements the ginkgo integration test framework for podman. As tests are migrated from bats to ginkgo, we will still run both integration suites. When a test is migrated, we remove the tests from bats at that time. All new tests should be just for the ginkgo framework. One exception is that we only run the ginkgo suit in the travis/ubuntu environment. The CentOS and Fedora PAPR nodes will more than cover those. Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com> Closes: #261 Approved by: baude