aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/e2e/run_exit_test.go
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* enable errcheck linterPaul Holzinger2022-04-29
| | | | | | | | The errcheck linter makes sure that errors are always check and not ignored by accident. It spotted a lot of unchecked errors, mostly in the tests but also some real problem in the code. Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
* bump go module to version 4Valentin Rothberg2022-01-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Automated for .go files via gomove [1]: `gomove github.com/containers/podman/v3 github.com/containers/podman/v4` Remaining files via vgrep [2]: `vgrep github.com/containers/podman/v3` [1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove [2] https://github.com/vrothberg/vgrep Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
* If container exits with 125 podman should exit with 125Daniel J Walsh2021-09-13
| | | | | | fixes: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/11540 Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* e2e tests: prevent 'Expect(ExitCode())' patternEd Santiago2021-07-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Followup to #10932: add a validation check to prevent introduction of new 'Expect(foo.ExitCode()).To(...)' patterns. If such use is absolutely necessary -- there is one such instance in the code already -- require that the assertion include a description. Also: clean up instances that were introduced since the merging of #10932. Also: fix one remaining instance in run_exit_test.go: it had a FIXME comment mentioning a race condition, but unfortunately there was no issue or bug ID, hence no way to know if the race is fixed or not. We will assume it is. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* e2e tests: use Should(Exit()) and ExitWithError()Ed Santiago2021-07-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | e2e test failures are rife with messages like: Expected 1 to equal 0 These make me cry. They're anti-helpful, requiring the reader to dive into the source code to figure out what those numbers mean. Solution: Go tests have a '.Should(Exit(NNN))' mechanism. I don't know if it spits out a better diagnostic (I have no way to run e2e tests on my laptop), but I have to fantasize that it will, and given the state of our flakes I assume that at least one test will fail and give me the opportunity to see what the error message looks like. THIS IS NOT REVIEWABLE CODE. There is no way for a human to review it. Don't bother. Maybe look at a few random ones for sanity. If you want to really review, here is a reproducer of what I did: cd test/e2e ! positive assertions. The second is the same as the first, ! with the addition of (unnecessary) parentheses because ! some invocations were written that way. The third is BeZero(). perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(\(Equal\((\d+)\)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit(0))/' *_test.go ! Same as above, but handles three non-numeric exit codes ! in run_exit_test.go perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Equal\((\S+)\)\)/Expect($1).Should(Exit($2))/' *_test.go ! negative assertions. Difference is the spelling of 'To(Not)', ! 'ToNot', and 'NotTo'. I assume those are all the same. perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.To\(Not\(Equal\((0)\)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.NotTo\(Equal\((0)\)\)/Expect($1).To(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go ! negative, old use of BeZero() perl -pi -e 's/Expect\((\S+)\.ExitCode\(\)\)\.ToNot\(BeZero\(\)\)/Expect($1).Should(ExitWithError())/' *_test.go Run those on a clean copy of main branch (at the same branch point as my PR, of course), then diff against a checked-out copy of my PR. There should be no differences. Then all you have to review is that my replacements above are sane. UPDATE: nope, that's not enough, you also need to add gomega/gexec to the files that don't have it: perl -pi -e '$_ .= "$1/gexec\"\n" if m!^(.*/onsi/gomega)"!' $(grep -L gomega/gexec $(git log -1 --stat | awk '$1 ~ /test\/e2e\// { print $1}')) UPDATE 2: hand-edit run_volume_test.go UPDATE 3: sigh, add WaitWithDefaultTimeout() to a couple of places UPDATE 4: skip a test due to bug #10935 (race condition) Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* bump go module to v3Valentin Rothberg2021-02-22
| | | | | | | | | We missed bumping the go module, so let's do it now :) * Automated go code with github.com/sirkon/go-imports-rename * Manually via `vgrep podman/v2` the rest Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
* Switch all references to github.com/containers/libpod -> podmanDaniel J Walsh2020-07-28
| | | | Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* move go module to v2Valentin Rothberg2020-07-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | With the advent of Podman 2.0.0 we crossed the magical barrier of go modules. While we were able to continue importing all packages inside of the project, the project could not be vendored anymore from the outside. Move the go module to new major version and change all imports to `github.com/containers/libpod/v2`. The renaming of the imports was done via `gomove` [1]. [1] https://github.com/KSubedi/gomove Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
* Get proper exit code when running or starting a container.Daniel J Walsh2020-05-21
| | | | | | | When we finish running a container, we need to call wait in order to get the exit code from the container. Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* v2 enable remote integration testsBrent Baude2020-05-19
| | | | | | enable remote integration tests Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
* Fix exit code failureDaniel J Walsh2019-09-17
| | | | | | Be less precise on the exit code and lot the exit code to the journal when it fails. Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* Podman-remote run should wait for exit codeDaniel J Walsh2019-09-12
| | | | | | | | This change matches what is happening on the podman local side and should eliminate a race condition. Also exit commands on the server side should start to return to client. Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* Use exit code constantsDaniel J Walsh2019-09-12
| | | | | | | We have leaked the exit number codess all over the code, this patch removes the numbers to constants. Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* test: enable all tests for crunGiuseppe Scrivano2019-08-19
| | | | Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
* tests: disable some tests currently failing when not using runcGiuseppe Scrivano2019-08-12
| | | | Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
* use imagecaches for local testsbaude2019-05-29
| | | | | | | | | when doing localized tests (not varlink), we can use secondary image stores as read-only image caches. this cuts down on test time significantly because each test does not need to restore the images from a tarball anymore. Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
* ginkgo status improvementsbaude2019-03-08
| | | | | | | a series of improvements to our ginkgo test framework so we can get better ideas of whats going on when run in CI Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
* Run integrations test with remote-clientbaude2019-01-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | Add the ability to run the integration (ginkgo) suite using the remote client. Only the images_test.go file is run right now; all the rest are isolated with a // +build !remotelinux. As more content is developed for the remote client, we can unblock the files and just block single tests as needed. Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
* Separate common used test functions and structs to test/utilsYiqiao Pu2018-11-16
| | | | | | | Put common used test functions and structs to a separated package. So we can use them for more testsuites. Signed-off-by: Yiqiao Pu <ypu@redhat.com>
* Show duration for each ginkgo test and test speed improvementsbaude2018-07-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Because our tests are getting so long, we want to be able to audit which tests are taking the longest to complete. This may indicate a bad test, bad CI, bad code, etc and therefore should be auditable. Also, make speed improvements to tests by making sure we only unpack caches images that actually get used. Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com> Closes: #1178 Approved by: mheon
* Correct exit code 126 and 127baude2018-02-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The exit codes for 126 and 127 were reversed. For the record, the exit codes used are as follows: * 125 if ‘chroot’ itself fails * 126 if COMMAND is found but cannot be invoked * 127 if COMMAND cannot be found This resolves issue #367 Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com> Closes: #378 Approved by: baude
* More ginkgo migrationbaude2018-02-07
* attach * run_exit * save * tag * version * run_privileged -> privileged Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf (git 2.39.0) at 2024-11-13 22:48:34 +0000