| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reason: to catch errors before they surface in RHEL.
One of the Ubuntus is specially crafted to run with cgroups v1
and runc. Although this isn't quite the same as RHEL, it's as
close as we can come in our CI environment, and I suspect it
would have caught #10234 (a regression).
Sorry, team.
Also: play kube limits test: skip on all rootless, not just
rootless+fedora. There was a complicated and unnecessary
check in there for Fedora.
Also: workaround for bug #10248, a spurious error message on
the first invocation of rootless podman on Ubuntu.Old
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a noop but helps with scripting and docker-compose.
Fixes: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/9806
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
podman-remote --help is showing a bunch of global flags that it
does not support
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is no need to setup the image and container engine when calling
a command with subcommands since we only print a usage message.
e.g `podman`,`podman container`
This also allows the remote client to show the usage message on
these commands without a running endpoint. I added a test for this.
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <paul.holzinger@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the go module version v2 to the libpod path.
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <paul.holzinger@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- new sanity checks for podman-remote:
- first, confirm that when PODMAN is "-remote",
we actually talk to a server (validated by
presence of "Server:" string in "podman version").
- second, add test for #7212, in which we run
"podman --remote" (podman with --remote flag,
not podman-remote command) and make sure --remote
is allowed both as the first option and also
with other flag options preceding.
- new test for "podman image tree" (piggybacking on
top of a "podman build" test, because that gives
us lots of layers).
- skip "podman exec - basic test" when remote. It is consistently
causing CI failures, breaking all of CI, due to #7241.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes the podman --version --format command.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
podman-remote rm now works; that's the only thing we were
waiting for to enable podman-remote (varlink) system tests.
Add a (too-complicated, sorry) Makefile target that will
define a random socket path, start the podman varlink server,
and run the test suite using podman-remote.
Also: add two convenience functions, is_rootless and is_remote,
and use those in skip_if_rootless/if_remote and elsewhere
Also: workarounds for broken tests:
- basic version test: podman-remote emits an empty 'Client'
line. Just ignore it.
- looks like 'podman-remote pod' doesn't work; skip test.
Also: minor documentation update
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- document a recommended convention for fail-fast tests
- document the requirement for jq. (And, add a fail-fast
test for its presence; remove the duplicated checks
in subtests)
- add further sanity checks to 'help' test. Add missing
documentation. Remove a no-longer-needed workaround for
usage-message bug fixed in #2486
- add a documented TEMPLATE
- and, since we're at 1.1, enable 'Remote API' check in
version test
- better diagnostics in setup/teardown; add vim filetype hint;
better formatting of actual-vs-expect errors
- new pod-top, logs, build tests
- improve error messages
- add $IMAGE alias for ridiculous $PODMAN_TEST_IMAGE_FQN
- final cleanup, in prep for merge
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
|
|
Initial attempt at writing a framework for podman system tests.
The idea is to define a useful set of primitives that will
make it easy to write actual tests and to interpret results
of failing ones.
This is a proof-of-concept right now; only a small number of
tests, by no means comprehensive. I am requesting review in
order to find showstopper problems: reasons why this approach
cannot work. Should there be none, we can work toward running
these as gating tests for Fedora and RHEL8.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
