summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/system/040-ps.bats
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* system tests: add assert(), and start using itEd Santiago2022-04-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Problem: the system test 'is()' checker was poorly thought out. For example, there is no way to check for inequality or for absence of a substring. Solution, step 1: introduce new assert(), copied almost verbatim from buildah, where it has been successful in addressing the gaps in is(). The logical next step is to search the tests for 'die' and for 'run', looking for negative assertions which we can replace with assert(). There were a lot, and in the process I found a number of ugly bugs in the tests themselves. I've taken the liberty of fixing these. Important note: at this time we have both assert() and is(). Replacing all instances of is() would be impossible to review. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* System tests: reenable ps --external testEd Santiago2022-04-11
| | | | | | | Buildah issue 3544 has been fixed and vendored into podman. We can reenable a long-skipped test. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* Revamp Libpod state strings for Docker compatMatthew Heon2022-01-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Improve our compatibility with Docker by better handling the state strings that we print in `podman ps`. Docker capitalizes all states in `ps` (we do not) - fix this in our PS code. Also, stop normalizing ContainerStateConfigured to the "Created" state, and instead make it always be Created, with the existing Created state becoming Initialized. I didn't rename the actual states because I'm somewhat reticent to make such a large change a day before we leave for break. It's somewhat confusing that ContainerStateConfigured now returns Created, but internally and externally we're still consistent. [NO NEW TESTS NEEDED] existing tests should catch anything that broke. I also consider this a breaking change. I will flag appropriately on Github. Fixes RHBZ#2010432 and RHBZ#2032561 Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
* Show --external containers even without --all optionDaniel J Walsh2021-12-14
| | | | | | | | | | | We currently do not show --external containers when the user specifies it, unless they also specify the --all flag. This has led to confusion. I see no reason not to list them without the --all flag if the user specifies the option. Fixes: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/12353 Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* Add --time out for podman * rm -f commandsDaniel J Walsh2021-10-04
| | | | | | | | | Add --time flag to podman container rm Add --time flag to podman pod rm Add --time flag to podman volume rm Add --time flag to podman network rm Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* Merge pull request #11762 from edsantiago/batsOpenShift Merge Robot2021-09-28
|\ | | | | System tests: speed up. They've gotten too slow.
| * System tests: speed up. They've gotten too slow.Ed Santiago2021-09-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - logs: remove unnecessary sleeps. This saves ~25s. Unfortunately, journald seems to have some sort of lag, so we need to keep retrying until we get the 'after' string. - ps: add placeholder test for once buildah 3544 is fixed - cp: bulk-kill containers when finished, instead of one by one. This is a big change and only saves about 8s per run, but hey. - mount,pause,healthcheck: 'podman stop -t 0' before rm'ing containers. Easy 50s. Have I mentioned, lately, that 'podman rm -f' needs a '-t 0' flag? - play: same, and also 'podman pod stop'. Seems to shave ~20s. - socket-activation: UGH! Buggy and useless tests! They were running "sleep 90" containers for no reason whatsoever. I assume the intention was to run them with "-d", so that's what I've done here. Also fixed some language. 180 seconds! (Unrelated: cleanup in 070-build, use $IMAGE, not alpine) Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* | image prune: support removing external containersValentin Rothberg2021-09-28
|/ | | | | | | | Support removing external containers (e.g., build containers) during image prune. Fixes: #11472 Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
* Add --noheading flag to all list commandsDaniel J Walsh2021-04-21
| | | | | | | | | | Currently we have only podman images list --noheading. This PR Adds this option to volumes, containers, pods, networks, machines, and secrets. Fixes: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/10065 Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* podman-remote ps --external --pod --sort do not work.Daniel J Walsh2021-01-27
| | | | | | | | | | Fixup the bindings and the handling of the --external --por and --sort flags. The --storage option was renamed --external, make sure we use external up and down the stack. Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* Fix handling of container removeDaniel J Walsh2021-01-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I found several problems with container remove podman-remote rm --all Was not handled podman-remote rm --ignore Was not handled Return better errors when attempting to remove an --external container. Currently we return the container does not exists, as opposed to container is an external container that is being used. This patch also consolidates the tunnel code to use the same code for removing the container, as the local API, removing duplication of code and potential problems. Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* system tests: the catch-up gameEd Santiago2020-12-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - run test: minor cleanup to .containerenv test. Basically, make it do only two podman-runs (they're expensive) and tighten up the results checks - ps test: add ps -a --storage. Requires small tweak to run_podman helper, so we can have "timeout" be an expected result - sdnotify test: workaround for #8718 (seeing MAINPID=xxx as last output line instead of READY=1). As found by the newly-added debugging echos, what we are seeing is: MAINPID=103530 READY=1 MAINPID=103530 It's not supposed to be that way; it's supposed to be just the first two. But when faced with reality, we must bend to accommodate it, so let's accept READY=1 anywhere in the output stream, not just as the last line. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* BATS: add ping testEd Santiago2020-12-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - run test : tweaks to recently-added network-conflict test: * remove "-d" in run * confirm exact warning text, and also that container runs successfully * test multiple --net options (regression #8057) - images, run, build, exec tests: add multiple-flag testing for various flags, confirming as appropriate whether options are overridden or accumulated. - ps test : add --filter and --sort tests - pod test: run 'ping' inside container (confirms that container gets PING capability) Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* Implement review feedbackEd Santiago2019-03-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - document a recommended convention for fail-fast tests - document the requirement for jq. (And, add a fail-fast test for its presence; remove the duplicated checks in subtests) - add further sanity checks to 'help' test. Add missing documentation. Remove a no-longer-needed workaround for usage-message bug fixed in #2486 - add a documented TEMPLATE - and, since we're at 1.1, enable 'Remote API' check in version test - better diagnostics in setup/teardown; add vim filetype hint; better formatting of actual-vs-expect errors - new pod-top, logs, build tests - improve error messages - add $IMAGE alias for ridiculous $PODMAN_TEST_IMAGE_FQN - final cleanup, in prep for merge Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* new system tests under BATSEd Santiago2019-03-07
Initial attempt at writing a framework for podman system tests. The idea is to define a useful set of primitives that will make it easy to write actual tests and to interpret results of failing ones. This is a proof-of-concept right now; only a small number of tests, by no means comprehensive. I am requesting review in order to find showstopper problems: reasons why this approach cannot work. Should there be none, we can work toward running these as gating tests for Fedora and RHEL8. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>