summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/system/075-exec.bats
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* System tests: new system-df and passwd testsEd Santiago2020-07-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - New test for #6991 - passwd file is writable even when run with --userns=keep-id - Enable another keep-id test, commented out due to #6593 - New test for podman system df Also, independently, removed this line: apt-get -y upgrade conmon ...because it's causing CI failures, probably because of the boothole CVE, probably because the Ubuntu grub update was rushed out. I believe it is safe to remove this, because both Ubuntu 19 and 20 report: conmon is already the newest version (2.0.18~1). Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* system tests: new tests for run, execEd Santiago2020-07-14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Issue #6735 : problem with multiple namespaces; confirms combinations of --userns=keep-id, --privileged, --user=XX - Issue #6829 : --userns=keep-id will add a /etc/passwd entry - Issue #6593 : podman exec, with --userns=keep-id, errors (test is currently skipped because issue remains live) ...and, addendum: add new helper function, remove_same_dev_warning. Some CI systems issue a warning on podman run --privileged: WARNING: The same type, major and minor should not be used for multiple devices. We already had special-case code to ignore than in the SELinux test, but now we're seeing it in the new run tests I added, so I've refactored the "ignore this warning" code and written tests for the removal code. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* system tests : more testsEd Santiago2020-06-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - exec: add test for #5046, in which conmon swallowed chars on a large byte transfer - pod: add 'pod exists' tests, both positive and negative; consolidate tests; add '--label', and check in 'pod inspect' add 'pod ps' tests - networking: add test for #5466, in which detached run with --userns=keep-id would not forward a port Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* more BATS testsEd Santiago2020-01-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - run: --name (includes 'podman container exists' tests) - run: --pull (always, never, missing) - build: new test for ADD URL (#4420) - exec: new test for issue #4785 (pipe getting lost) - diff: new test - selinux (mostly copied from docker-autotest) Plus a bug fix: the wait_for_output() helper would continue checking, eventually timing out, even if the container had already exited (probably because of an error). Fix: as part of the loop, run 'podman inspect' and bail out if container is not running. Include exit code and logs. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* System tests: make sure exec pid hash w/o leakingAlex Jia2019-10-18
| | | | | | | | | | podman exec leaks an exec_pid_<hash> file for every exec in tmpfs, it's known rhbz#1731117, this case makes sure leakage issue has been fixed. rhbz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731117 Signed-off-by: Alex Jia <chuanchang.jia@gmail.com>
* BATS tests: start supporting podman-remoteEd Santiago2019-04-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | podman-remote now supports rm! That's what we needed to start running BATS tests. Although most tests don't actually work, some do, and maybe the rest will start working over time. For now, disable them. The only significant difference found is that podman-remote strips fractional seconds from timestamps in JSON output. Probably not something worth caring about. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
* BATS: new tests, and improvements to existing onesEd Santiago2019-03-18
New: - podman exec - podman load (requires #2674) - CLI parsing (regression test for #2574) Improved: - help: test "podman NoSuchCommand", and subcommands - help: test "podman cmd" without required args - pod: start with --infra=false; this allows running rootless - log: also run 'logs' after container is run - log: test -f with two containers Also, use helpful descriptions for skip_if_rootless Tested on f29, root and rootless. As soon as podman-remote supports rm, I'll start testing that too. Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>