| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We need to remove the container after it has exited for
podman-remote run --rm commands. If we don't remove this
container at this step, we open ourselves up to race conditions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NOTE: the remote tests are not reenabled but the changes are applied.
Future commits depend on some of the changes and having the commit
applied will likely facilitate future backports as well.
podman-remote is in better shape now. Let's see what needs
to be done to reenable remote system tests.
- logs test: skip multilog, it doesn't work remote
- diff test: use -l only when local, not with remote
- many other tests: skip_if_remote, with 'FIXME: pending #xxxx'
where xxxx is a filed issue.
Unrelated: added new helper to skip_if_remote and _if_rootless,
where we check if the source message includes "remote"/"rootless"
and insert it if missing. This is a minor usability enhancement
to make it easier to understand at-a-glance why a skip triggers.
Backported-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When creating a pod or container where a static MAC or IP address is provided, we should return a proper error and exit as 125.
Fixes: #6972
Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
<MH: Fixed build after cherry-pick>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- (minor): apiv2 tests: check for full ID
Observation made while reviewing #6461: tests were checking
only for a 12-character container/image ID in return value.
It's actually 64, and we should test for that. This should
also minimize confusion in a future maintainer.
- podman pause/unpause: new test
Runs a 'date/sleep' loop, pauses container, sleeps 3s,
restarts, then confirms that there's a 3- to 6-second
gap in the logs for the container.
- podman healthcheck: new test
run a container with healthcheck, test both healthy
and unhealthy conditions
- podman pod: check '{{.Pod}}' field in podman ps
Hey, as long as we have a pod with two running
containers, might as well confirm that 'podman ps'
returns the expected pod ID.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- exec: add test for #5046, in which conmon swallowed chars
on a large byte transfer
- pod: add 'pod exists' tests, both positive and negative;
consolidate tests; add '--label', and check in 'pod inspect'
add 'pod ps' tests
- networking: add test for #5466, in which detached run
with --userns=keep-id would not forward a port
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Boaz Shuster <boaz.shuster.github@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sujil02 <sushah@redhat.com>
|
|
|
* rename pod-top.bats to pod.bats
* add test for TCP port communication between pods
* add test for various podman-pod-create options
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
