| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In these tests, don't try to tag an image using a canonical ("with
digest") image name.
Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/10393
Currently if a user specifies a --root flag to override the location of
the container storage, we still enforce the storage-opts from
storage.conf. This causes issues with people trying to intereact with
the additional stores feature, and then forces them to use the obscure
--storage-opt="" option. I belive this should be the default and we
already do this when the user specifies the --storage-driver option.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Followup to #10033: actually implement the system reset test.
And, just out of paranoia, extend the warning-message check.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
|
|
In libpod/image.Image.Remove(), if the attempt to find the image's
parent fails for any reason, log a warning and proceed as though it
didn't have one instead of failing, which would leave us unable to
remove the image without resetting everything.
In libpod/Runtime.RemoveImage(), if we can't determine if an image has
children, log a warning, and assume that it doesn't have any instead of
failing, which would leave us unable to remove the image without
resetting everything.
In pkg/domain/infra/abi.ImageEngine.Remove(), when attempting to remove
all images, if we encounter an error checking if a given image has
children, log a warning, and assume that it doesn't have any instead of
failing, which would leave us unable to remove the image without
resetting everything.
Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin@redhat.com>
|
