| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The shell completion should only suggest arguments that work. Using a
image without tag does not work in many cases. Having both the version
with and without tag also forces users to press one key more because
tab completion will always stop at the colon.
Fixes #11673
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the SECRET keyword to the shell completion test. Also update the
use line for podman secret create to use `NAME` instead of `SECRET`.
This matches the other commands such as network/volume create.
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <paul.holzinger@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tracking down a CI failure earlier today, I was slightly
delayed by the absence of context information in a test
failure. This PR adds full command context to each
subtest, making it much easier for the developer to
narrow down the cause of a failure.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com> for the fix.
Signed-off-by: Chris Evich <cevich@redhat.com>
|
|
|
There exists a unit test to ensure that shell completion functions are
defined. However there was no check about the quality of the provided
shell completions. Lets change that.
The idea is to create a general test that makes sure we are suggesting
containers,pods,images... for the correct commands. This works by
reading the command use line and checking for each arg if we provide
the correct suggestions for this arg.
It includes the following tests:
- flag suggestions if [options] is set
- container, pod, image, network, volume, registry completion
- path completion for the appropriate arg KEYWORDS (`PATH`,`CONTEXT`,etc.)
- no completion if there are no args
- completion for more than one arg if it ends with `...]`
The test does not cover completion values for flags and not every arg KEYWORD
is supported. This is still a huge improvement and covers most use cases.
This test spotted several inconsistencies between the completion and the
command use line. All of them have been adjusted to make the test pass.
The biggest advantage is that the completions always match the latest
command changes. So if someone changes the arguments for a command this
ensures that the completions must be adjusted.
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <paul.holzinger@web.de>
|
