summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/vendor/github.com/Microsoft/go-winio/pkg
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Use storage that better supports rootless overlayfsNick Guenther2022-03-01
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | overlayfs -- the kernel's version, not fuse-overlayfs -- recently learned (as of linux 5.16.0, I believe) how to support rootless users. Previously, rootless users had to use these storage.conf(5) settings: * storage.driver=vfs (aka STORAGE_DRIVER=vfs), or * storage.driver=overlay (aka STORAGE_DRIVER=overlay), storage.options.overlay.mount_program=/usr/bin/fuse-overlayfs (aka STORAGE_OPTS=/usr/bin/fuse-overlayfs) Now that a third backend is available, setting only: * storage.driver=overlay (aka STORAGE_DRIVER=overlay) https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/13123 reported EXDEV errors during the normal operation of their container. Tracing it out, the problem turned out to be that their container was being mounted without 'userxattr'; I don't fully understand why, but mount(8) mentions this is needed for rootless users: > userxattr > > Use the "user.overlay." xattr namespace instead of "trusted.overlay.". > This is useful for unprivileged mounting of overlayfs. https://github.com/containers/storage/pull/1156 found and fixed the issue in podman, and this just pulls in that via go get github.com/containers/storage@ebc90ab go mod vendor make vendor Closes https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/13123 Signed-off-by: Nick Guenther <nick.guenther@polymtl.ca>
* image lookup: do not match *any* tagsValentin Rothberg2021-11-23
| | | | | | | | | | For reasons buried in the history of Podman, looking up an untagged image would match any tag of matching image. For instance, looking up centos would match a local image centos:foobar. Change that behavior to only match the latest tag. Fix: #11964 Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
* Bump github.com/containers/storage from 1.25.0 to 1.28.0Giuseppe Scrivano2021-03-18
| | | | | | | | | | Bumps [github.com/containers/storage](https://github.com/containers/storage) from 1.25.0 to 1.28.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/containers/storage/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/containers/storage/blob/master/docs/containers-storage-changes.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/containers/storage/compare/v1.25.0...v1.28.0) Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <support@dependabot.com> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
* Bump github.com/containers/storage from 1.24.3 to 1.24.4dependabot-preview[bot]2020-12-23
| | | | | | | | | | Bumps [github.com/containers/storage](https://github.com/containers/storage) from 1.24.3 to 1.24.4. - [Release notes](https://github.com/containers/storage/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/containers/storage/blob/master/docs/containers-storage-changes.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/containers/storage/compare/v1.24.3...v1.24.4) Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <support@dependabot.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
* Update c/image to v4.0.1 and buildah to 1.11.3Miloslav Trmač2019-10-04
This requires updating all import paths throughout, and a matching buildah update to interoperate. I can't figure out the reason for go.mod tracking github.com/containers/image v3.0.2+incompatible // indirect ((go mod graph) lists it as a direct dependency of libpod, but (go list -json -m all) lists it as an indirect dependency), but at least looking at the vendor subdirectory, it doesn't seem to be actually used in the built binaries. Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmač <mitr@redhat.com>