From 3bdad6fa2af41be7e783256f3c8a213dc42ca8f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Valentin Rothberg Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:13:50 +0200 Subject: podmanV2: implement pull Implement pulling images for the v2 client. What I _really_ don't like is the fact that we are now having a near identical code clone among `pkg/domain/infra/abi` and `pkg/api/handlers/libpod`. Partly because we don't yet have a higher-level pull function and partly because we have redudancy among `pkg/domain` and `pkg/api`. Pull might be a high outlier but I am concerned already by the potential of introducing more redundancy. I'd love to `infra/abi` and `pkg/abi` to really use the same code in the future. Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg --- pkg/domain/infra/tunnel/images.go | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) (limited to 'pkg/domain/infra/tunnel/images.go') diff --git a/pkg/domain/infra/tunnel/images.go b/pkg/domain/infra/tunnel/images.go index 6a3adc9ee..7638d908a 100644 --- a/pkg/domain/infra/tunnel/images.go +++ b/pkg/domain/infra/tunnel/images.go @@ -85,3 +85,11 @@ func (ir *ImageEngine) Prune(ctx context.Context, opts entities.ImagePruneOption } return &report, nil } + +func (ir *ImageEngine) Pull(ctx context.Context, rawImage string, options entities.ImagePullOptions) (*entities.ImagePullReport, error) { + pulledImages, err := images.Pull(ir.ClientCxt, rawImage, options) + if err != nil { + return nil, err + } + return &entities.ImagePullReport{Images: pulledImages}, nil +} -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf