From 6b7612062ebf25f9969233b1accea3e376c313cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Heon Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:57:19 -0500 Subject: Correct port range logic for port generation The existing logic (Range > 0) always triggered, because range is guaranteed to be at least 1 (a single port has a range of 1, a two port range (e.g. 80-81) has a range of 2, and so on). As such this could cause ports that had a host port assigned to them by the user to randomly assign one instead. Fixes #8650 Fixes #8651 Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon --- pkg/specgen/generate/ports.go | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'pkg/specgen') diff --git a/pkg/specgen/generate/ports.go b/pkg/specgen/generate/ports.go index 5c13c95b2..83ded059f 100644 --- a/pkg/specgen/generate/ports.go +++ b/pkg/specgen/generate/ports.go @@ -107,7 +107,11 @@ func parsePortMapping(portMappings []specgen.PortMapping) ([]ocicni.PortMapping, var index uint16 for index = 0; index < len; index++ { cPort := containerPort + index - hPort := hostPort + index + hPort := hostPort + // Only increment host port if it's not 0. + if hostPort != 0 { + hPort += index + } if cPort == 0 { return nil, nil, nil, errors.Errorf("container port cannot be 0") @@ -162,8 +166,8 @@ func parsePortMapping(portMappings []specgen.PortMapping) ([]ocicni.PortMapping, tempMappings, tempMapping{ mapping: cniPort, - startOfRange: port.Range > 0 && index == 0, - isInRange: port.Range > 0, + startOfRange: port.Range > 1 && index == 0, + isInRange: port.Range > 1, }, ) } @@ -183,7 +187,7 @@ func parsePortMapping(portMappings []specgen.PortMapping) ([]ocicni.PortMapping, for _, tmp := range tempMappings { p := tmp.mapping - if p.HostPort != 0 && !tmp.isInRange { + if p.HostPort != 0 { remadeMappings = append(remadeMappings, p) continue } -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf