From e577ddf3bdf8bb594d1b3287053d6aa61aeae784 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel J Walsh Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 20:56:49 -0500 Subject: Prefer read/write images over read/only images With additional stores there is a risk that you could have multiple images with the same name. IE An older image in a read/only store versus a newer version in the read/write store. This patch will ignore multiple images with the same name iff one is read/write and all of the others are read/only. Fixes: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/8176 Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh --- test/e2e/exists_test.go | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'test') diff --git a/test/e2e/exists_test.go b/test/e2e/exists_test.go index 7ff5d4207..480bfe5fc 100644 --- a/test/e2e/exists_test.go +++ b/test/e2e/exists_test.go @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ var _ = Describe("Podman image|container exists", func() { Expect(session).Should(Exit(0)) }) It("podman image exists in local storage by short name", func() { - Skip("FIXME-8165: shortnames don't seem to work with quay (#8176)") session := podmanTest.Podman([]string{"image", "exists", "alpine"}) session.WaitWithDefaultTimeout() Expect(session).Should(Exit(0)) -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf