diff options
| author | baude <bbaude@redhat.com> | 2018-02-15 08:17:35 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Atomic Bot <atomic-devel@projectatomic.io> | 2018-02-16 18:35:54 +0000 |
| commit | 586bb86a2ac58056b0d0d23274fb98ec599b0908 (patch) | |
| tree | 831019f054727e219c2bd11a083b0b10a90cd974 /test/e2e/run_privileged_test.go | |
| parent | bc1d25bb19c1664b5669c13d6ff2811571284d27 (diff) | |
| download | podman-586bb86a2ac58056b0d0d23274fb98ec599b0908.tar.gz podman-586bb86a2ac58056b0d0d23274fb98ec599b0908.tar.bz2 podman-586bb86a2ac58056b0d0d23274fb98ec599b0908.zip | |
Run podman inside a podman container
We should be able to run nested podman containers in particular
for our testing environment. i.e. eat our own dog food.
Some privileges had to be corrected in order for this to work
correctly.
Added a third papr target that runs podman tests inside podman. I
marked the test as not required right now as we get more confident
in the results
Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
Closes: #340
Approved by: rhatdan
Diffstat (limited to 'test/e2e/run_privileged_test.go')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/e2e/run_privileged_test.go | 7 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/test/e2e/run_privileged_test.go b/test/e2e/run_privileged_test.go index b53be15f0..430698ba1 100644 --- a/test/e2e/run_privileged_test.go +++ b/test/e2e/run_privileged_test.go @@ -61,16 +61,11 @@ var _ = Describe("Podman privileged container tests", func() { }) It("podman cap-drop CapEff", func() { - cap := podmanTest.SystemExec("grep", []string{"CapAmb", "/proc/self/status"}) - cap.WaitWithDefaultTimeout() - Expect(cap.ExitCode()).To(Equal(0)) session := podmanTest.Podman([]string{"run", "--cap-drop", "all", "busybox", "grep", "CapEff", "/proc/self/status"}) session.WaitWithDefaultTimeout() Expect(session.ExitCode()).To(Equal(0)) - - capAmp := strings.Split(cap.OutputToString(), " ") capEff := strings.Split(session.OutputToString(), " ") - Expect(capAmp[1]).To(Equal(capEff[1])) + Expect("0000000000000000").To(Equal(capEff[1])) }) It("podman non-privileged should have very few devices", func() { |