| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Just like the other inspect commands `podman pod inspect p1 p2` should
return the json for both.
To correctly implement this we follow the container inspect logic, this
allows use to reuse the global inspect command.
Note: To not break the existing single pod output format for podman pod
inspect I added a pod-legacy inspect type. This is only used to make
sure we will print the pod as single json and not an array like for the
other commands. We cannot use the pod type since podman inspect --type
pod did return an array and we should not break that as well.
Fixes #15674
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add all option that are supported by the podman inspect --type flag to
the completions. Also use the same constants instead of duplicating the
strings. In order to do this I had to move the definitions into the
common package to prevent an import cycle.
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A surprisingly big change. A core problem was that `podman inspect`
allows for passing containers AND images with the default `--type=all`.
This only worked partially as the data was processed in isolation which
caused various issues (e.g., two separate outputs instead of one) but it
also caused issues regarding error handling.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
|
|
|
remote podman v1 and replace with podman v2.
Signed-off-by: Brent Baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
|
