| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Easy one: text was already identical between both files.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Two different texts, split into two .md files. Nontrivial, but
still easy to review because the text is unchanged.
I was unable to reconcile either version with podman-build,
so that file remains with a separate version.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ugh. This had about five different variations among twelve files.
I went with the version from podman-create, kube play, login, pull,
push, run. The others:
- manifest-add and create did not include the "true, false, missing"
text. Now they do. (If this text is N/A to these two, please yell).
Also, these two were written with "talking" instead of "contacting"
the registry.
- podman-build had "does not work with remote", but this
does not seem to be true, so I removed it. None of the
other files had that.
- the wording in podman-search is just weird, with "if needed"
and "is listed" and unclear "insecure registries". I just
nuked it all. If that wording was deliberate, for some reason
that applies only to podman-search, please yell.
- podman-container-runlabel has one diff that I like, actually
spelling out containers-registries.conf(5), but incorporating
that would make this even harder to review. I will add that
to my in-progress doc-cleanup PR.
Review recommendation: run hack/markdown-preprocess-review but
just quit out of it immediately (on both popups). Ignore it completely.
Then cd /tmp/markdown-preprocess-review.diffs/tls-verify and run
$ clear;for i in podman-*;do echo;echo $i;wdiff -t $i zzz-chosen.md;done
This will show the major diffs between each version and the chosen one.
Assumes you have wdiff installed. If you have another colorize-actual-
individual-word-diffs tool installed, use that. I like cdif[1].
[1] https://github.com/kaz-utashiro/sdif-tools
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Denton <adenton@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I've been doing the man-page cleanup distractedly, while
fighting other fires, and submitted some crap:
* #15339: I used single angle brackets, not double
* #15407: I only refactored --cert-dir from some man pages, not all
Easy to review with hack/markdown-preprocess-review, because all the
removed texts are identical. The only diff is that container-certs.d
is now a link.
Sorry about that. I'm going to spend more time being careful.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Refactor the --creds option. I went with the one in podman-pull
The main difference between all of them is the '####' line,
differences in the param descriptions. podman-pull had the
clearest one.
This is another one that hack/markdown-preprocess-review is
good for reviewing.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
|
|
Refactor the --authfile option.
My suggestion for review:
1) run hack/markdown-preprocess-review and immediately Ctrl-Q to
quit out of diffuse, which is completely unusable for this
many files; then
2) cd /tmp/markdown-preprocess-review.diffs/authfile
- this is the directory created by the review script
3) rm podman-image-sign* podman-log* podman-search.1.md.in
- because they're essentially identical to podman-create
4) rm podman-manifest-* podman-push.*
- because they're 100% identical to podman-kube-play
5) rm podman-kube-play*
- because it's apart-from-whitespace identical to podman-build
(use "wdiff" to confirm)
6) rm podman-auto-update*
- because that's the one I chose (hence == zzz-chosen.md)
(You should obviously run your own diff/cmp before rm, to confirm
my assertions about which files are identical).
After all that, you have a manageable number of files which
you can scan, read, diff against zzz-chosen.md, even run diffuse.
This option is IMHO the poster child for why we need this kind
of man page refactoring.
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
|
